fast learner + capped potential v moderate learner + uncapped potential
Which would you prefer? Being someone who learns fast but with a limited potential or someone who learns moderately but with an unlimited potential?
Obviously, being someone who learns fast and has unlimited potential is the best. But reality usually doesn't give you the best of both worlds. And this is pretty much justified.
For someone who learns fast, he's usually someone intelligent, but intelligence comes at a price, always achieving success makes you follow a pre-determined path, you tend not to explore and make mistakes and soon your mind is moulded to always follow this path. Whereas, for someone who learns moderately or slowly, mistakes are abundant, he gets used to making mistakes and learns what's right but never fails to question why he is wrong. He argues for his cause and will learn to formulate his own theories.
If you assume that speed of learning results in this pre-set route to take, then this reasoning probably holds true. But well, there are anomalies, there are people who learn fast but can think out of the box too. These are the geniuses, the future greats of their field.
Are you one of them? It's time to stop being so obsessed with being right all the time.