A dark and strange
exploration of male sexuality, Carnal
Knowledge sprang from the bitter pen of playwright/satirist Jules Feiffer,
with the sophisticated social observer Mike Nichols serving as director. The
story begins in the ’50s, when college roommates Jonathan (Jack Nicholson) and
Sandy (Art Garfunkel) fumble their way through early sexual encounters with
coeds. Jonathan’s an unapologetic horndog who soothes his insecurities through
physical conquest, and, at least in his early days, Sandy is a romantic trying
to balance libidinous urges with respect for women. The boys form a triangle
with worldly coed Susan (Candice Bergen), who is drawn to Sandy’s sweetness but
can’t resist Jonathan’s confidence. After this triangle runs its painful
course, the movie skips forward and eventually lands in late-’60s New York
City.
Jonathan, who has grown into a deeply angry adult, gets involved with
Bobbie (Ann-Margret), an older woman whose va-va-voom figure drives him wild.
Unfortunately for him, she comes complete with emotional needs that he’s
incapable of meeting, so their romance devolves into a regular schedule of screeching
arguments. Meanwhile, Sandy becomes a seeker of sorts, bouncing from one
unsatisfactory relationship to the next, and Jonathan makes wildly
inappropriate passes at Sandy’s girlfriends.
Much of the picture’s nonstop
dialogue is sharp, capturing the extremes of emotionally crippled individuals.
In one harrowing moment, for instance, Jonathan screams to Bobbie, “For God’s
sake, I’d almost marry you if you’d leave me!” Nonetheless, the wall-to-wall
dysfunction is a bit much. Since Feiffer and Nichols populate the movie
exclusively with characters who are horrible or weak, if not both, their
implied statement about the inability of men and women to coexist seems arch,
forced, and unpersuasive. It’s also unclear whether Carnal Knowledge is meant to be drama or satire—is watching these sad
people destroy each other supposed to be funny?
Nonetheless, the film garnered
considerable praise during its initial release, with Ann-Margret winning a
Golden Globe and Feiffer earning a Writers Guild Award nomination. Furthermore,
the film’s craftsmanship is impeccable. Nichols employs a restrained visual
style, putting the focus on potent acting. The four lead actors are quite good,
with Ann-Margret surpassing the low expectations established by her long string
of shallow sex-kitten roles prior to this movie. Bergen conveys an alluring
brand of icy intelligence, while ’60s pop icon Garfunkel, giving his first
major dramatic performance, presents a unique sort of natural twitchiness. As
for Nicholson, he’s hamstrung by a severe characterization, since Jonathan is
more a compendium of compulsions than a genuine individual. Nicholson’s
performance is creepily intense, but not realistic.
Carnal Knowledge: FUNKY