Received
a comment to my previous entry from an anonymous "reader", and I thought it would be good for me to "pen down" my thoughts to his/her comments. (There are few things he/she mentioned which I both agree and disagree.) And of course, hi to you, anonymous, if you still "happen" to be reading my puny blog, and this "reply" for that matter. After all, there really isn't such a thing known as "accident" in His created world.
I agree with him/her that Jesus does offer eternal life, which in itself is a fact, but I think that shouldn't be the reason why we accept Christ. After all, no matter who, all will have eternal life. The only difference is that those who
love God will be in His kingdom, enjoying the perfect relationship with our Creator forever; those who don't will be burnt in hell, forever too (Rev 20:15). Which is why, Jesus said,
For whoever wants to save his life will lose it, but whoever loses his life for me will save it. (Luke 9:24, also in Mat 10:39, Mark 8:35)
I'm not advocating that we must die for God in order to have eternal life. Far from it! I believe, those who come forth and respond willingly to God's calling, "fighting" the good "fight" (as in serving God wholeheartedly), or even just loving God without reserves, are the people who will inherit the kingdom of God. (After all, responding willingly to God's calling would most likely be a response out of love.)
Are those "following" the laws (or the more updated doctrine in our age) going to enter His kingdom? No! And we are to be reminded of that in the narrative recorded in Luke 18:18-29 (the narrative of the rich ruler). Thus, what matters most to God is that we have to follow (read: love) Him wholeheartedly.
However, since we are mere humans, always are tempted both by the devil and his minions, as well as our own desires, we will always "fall short of the glory of God" (Rom 3:23). But our salvation do not depend on the things we do; it is by His grace that we are saved. And in response to His grace, we choose to follow and love Him. In our temporary pilgrimage here on earth, we try our best to submit ourselves to Him (with the aid of the Holy Spirit, of course; and for that matter, during these times, submitting to another requires love too).
Yup, as he/she has mentioned, there are many issues that seem contradictory, but the good news for us is: Jesus only gave us two commandments (to replace the ten commandments in OT). First, we must love God with our heart, and to love our neighbors as ourselves. (Actually, I kinda lied: the two commandments Jesus gave is actually the essence of the ten commandments.) So, what am I trying to say here? We can never be made perfect by our own means; we can only be made perfect by His love.
We shouldn't add more burden than necessary to our pilgrimage; it would be wise to discern what God wants us to do, and not what the church wants us to do. And personally, I believe that His love should be the reason why I'm turning to Him (and not to the rest of the "gods". Eternal life? Why strive for something that everyone has?
As for the issues on believers and unbelievers being togther, I still firmly believe that God will make the path straight (eventually) when they are together. Yup, there are cases that things don't turn out well, but should that be the guideline in choosing our partners? That, I believe, is the reason why churches advice her members not to marry unbelievers, which sadly, has been mis-interpreted as a doctrine/commandment/law/whatever. I'm not advocating (again) this advice is useless; I'm just saying that, when handling such relationships (believer-unbeliever), God being in the picture is
extremely important. Christians are free to choose whether they want to heed the advice the churches give, but I think it's extremely important to be aware that
this is only an advice, not a law! I think that the believer in such the believer-unbeliever relationship should always put things in God's hand, and he/she must end the relationship if God says so. After all, God could be using the unbeliever to test his/her obedience; whatever the case is, following His will should have the utmost priority in all things.
Taking 2 Cor 6:14 to the extreme (i.e. mis-interpretation), are we to disassociate ourselves from unbelievers in all matters? Again, on face value (plus the extreme mis-interpretation), the answer is yes! Of course, we all know that is not the case, since Jesus gave us the great commission: "go and make disciples of all nations" (Mat 28:19). Hence, it is very dangerous to quote verses without knowing the context it was written in.
Of course, some of the teachings should be, so called, "updated" to fit the current era. For example, to whom the 7th commandmant "You shall not commit adultery" (Exo 20:14) was written to? All the Israelites? Haha, you're wrong if there was your answer. That commandment was written for the women back in that era! After all, recall that it was perfectly okay for men at that time to practice polygamy! Yes, God's original intent (as recorded in Gen 2:24) that monogamy is the ideal, but in order to provide for His daughters (i.e. the women), He permitted polygamy. Hence, men during that time couldn't possibly commit adultery (as long as the man marries the woman he has slept with, what adultery has he committed?), only women could. But in our era, where the law (in most countries) only permits monogamy, this 7th commandment applies to both men and women. Although we are not within the Law anymore (as in the ten commandments in the OT), Jesus taught about adultery during His sermon on the mount/plain (Mat 5:27-32), and hence, a commandment was kinda "updated" to fit into modern times. But not all cases are like this, and hence, we should be careful in how we read the Bible.
In short, we could never, ever meet the high level of standards God has set for us; He did it 'cos He wants to us to be constantly reminded that we are to depend on Him in all things, and more importantly, to love Him wholeheartedly. (We must still strive to reach the standards He has set even though we may never meet the standards, though. So we cannot be too laid back...)
Phew, what I thought would be a short "reply" has evolved into a full screen (or depending your monitor's resolution, several screens) of thoughts.... Haha... I'm becoming more and more naggy with each passing day.... But whatever the case is, I would still like to thank anomyous on his/her care for my spiritual life, as well as his/her love for a fellow brother-in-Christ... :)
By the way, if you are interested to know, Elena is a fellow sister-in-Christ.... And for that matter, I'm grateful..... :)