I've been absent quite a bit from this blog lately, but that's not all. I completely missed both the TBA Festival and Wordstock. I have yet to take in Ragtime and China Design Now. And god only knows if I'll make it to the Emerald Retrospective or the Oregon Symphony anytime soon.
For what? A myriad of excuses. I haven't caught the swine flu but I think I coughed up part of my lung last weekend. I love the fall but who wants to go out in some of this weather? I'm not addicted to television but it sure is comfortable watching Glee and Mad Men from my La-z-boy recliner.
We've also been hard at work raising Work for Art dollars and overhauling the RACC website, which was no small task. Suffice it to say that spending this much time in front of the computer at work makes it really hard to spend any time in front of the computer at home, blogging or otherwise. And although this isn't the ultimate purpose of this post I would be remiss if I didn't use this paragraph to acknowledge the fine work of the design team at Davison/Blackheart, CultureShock commenter Shobiz, and the great staff at RACC for producing such a handsome site with volumes of valuable content for the arts community. Blogger's prerogative, no matter how infrequently he writes.
My related arts observation for today comes from Hilary Pfeifer, whose temporary installation "Vertical Garden" is currently featured on our homepage. She wrote to let us know that the piece, which was originally created for the Portland Building Installation Series several years ago, was recently sold to a Pixar executive in Marin. I thought you might enjoy her blog entry on installing the piece in his home, as I did. Congratulations, Hilary!
If you know any artists who are looking to get a temporary installation gig for themselves, RACC is accepting proposals through November 16.
Showing posts with label RACC. Show all posts
Showing posts with label RACC. Show all posts
Missing in Action
Posted by
culturejock
on
Thursday, October 15, 2009
Labels:
artists,
public art,
RACC
Who's on Top?
Posted by
MightyToyCannon
on
Wednesday, September 30, 2009
OregonBusiness magazine just released its ranking of the Top 100 Nonprofits to work for in Oregon. I didn't make it to the award ceremony last night, but received the rankings this morning.
The organization with which I am associated, Oregon Children’s Theatre, ranked 26th in the “Small Company” category (with a score of 479.2). Woohoo! We're 26th!
Broadway Rose Theatre beat us at 21st place in the same group (score of 485.7); however, as a musical theater company it has the advantage of lots of happy singing and dancing to boost morale. Our friends at Portland Center Stage reached 30th place in the “Large” category (more than 75 employees) with a score of just under 411. I believe that means we kicked their asses, and I don't care who knows it. Oregon Shakespeare Festival brought up the rear in that category at 33rd place (score of 406.2).
Our other friends at the Regional Arts and Culture Council placed 9th in the “Medium” category (24-74 employees) with a respectable score of nearly 474. The table provided by OregonBusiness describes RACC’s purpose as providing “pre-natal to end-of-life social services to low-income people.” That sounds about right since they support artists.
The only other arts group in the rankings was Caldera, scoring 9th in the small category with score of 499.3 -- very well done.
Who ranked at the very top? Susan G. Komen for the Cure, OR/SWW Affiliate in the large category with a score of 520.7; Idealist.org in the middle group at 519.4; and, Oregon Rehabilitation carrying the small group (with a whopping score of 537.7).
The organization with which I am associated, Oregon Children’s Theatre, ranked 26th in the “Small Company” category (with a score of 479.2). Woohoo! We're 26th!
Broadway Rose Theatre beat us at 21st place in the same group (score of 485.7); however, as a musical theater company it has the advantage of lots of happy singing and dancing to boost morale. Our friends at Portland Center Stage reached 30th place in the “Large” category (more than 75 employees) with a score of just under 411. I believe that means we kicked their asses, and I don't care who knows it. Oregon Shakespeare Festival brought up the rear in that category at 33rd place (score of 406.2).
Our other friends at the Regional Arts and Culture Council placed 9th in the “Medium” category (24-74 employees) with a respectable score of nearly 474. The table provided by OregonBusiness describes RACC’s purpose as providing “pre-natal to end-of-life social services to low-income people.” That sounds about right since they support artists.
The only other arts group in the rankings was Caldera, scoring 9th in the small category with score of 499.3 -- very well done.
Who ranked at the very top? Susan G. Komen for the Cure, OR/SWW Affiliate in the large category with a score of 520.7; Idealist.org in the middle group at 519.4; and, Oregon Rehabilitation carrying the small group (with a whopping score of 537.7).
Oy! More on the Oregon Cultural Trust
Posted by
MightyToyCannon
on
Monday, March 09, 2009
Tuesday's episode of "Think Out Loud" on OPB Radio will cover the topic of arts funding, with the theft of Cultural Trust funds dangled as a teaser. The episode, which airs at 9:00 a.m. on 91.5 (as if our readers need to be told the frequency) is titled "The Art of Hard Times."
The OPB website does not give any hints about scheduled guests. I wonder if we'll hear from Doug Stamm at the Meyer Memorial Trust. In his Oregonian column this morning ("Who Took the Trust Out of the Cultural Trust"), Barry Johnson quotes Mr. Stamm's response to the Oregon legislature's move to purloin $1.8 million from the Cultural Trust. The Meyer Trust (the legacy of Fred Meyer) has supported the Oregon Cultural Trust with big grants to underwrite efforts to raise public awareness and encourage contributions. Stamm said he was "perplexed and frustrated" by the legislature's move:
I believe the Meyer Trust is still the largest private foundation in Oregon, so it will be interesting to see what kind of clout it has on this topic, should its leaders choose to lean on our legislators. I'd call in to the show, but I'll be driving to Salem in the morning on a non-arts related task involving armed robbery (literally), on which I will report later. (How's that for a teaser)?
Also, our friends at the Regional Arts and Culture Council(RACC) and the new Creative Advocacy Network (CAN) are calling for arts advocates to show up at City Hall on Thursday, March 12, 2008 (2:00 to 3:00 pm) to lend moral support as RACC gives its “State of the Arts” presentation to City Council. I suspect the turnout will be high and folks will be pumped up -- one positive legacy of the Cultural Trust debacle.
The OPB website does not give any hints about scheduled guests. I wonder if we'll hear from Doug Stamm at the Meyer Memorial Trust. In his Oregonian column this morning ("Who Took the Trust Out of the Cultural Trust"), Barry Johnson quotes Mr. Stamm's response to the Oregon legislature's move to purloin $1.8 million from the Cultural Trust. The Meyer Trust (the legacy of Fred Meyer) has supported the Oregon Cultural Trust with big grants to underwrite efforts to raise public awareness and encourage contributions. Stamm said he was "perplexed and frustrated" by the legislature's move:
The citizens of Oregon made specific contributions to a fund and now it's being moved to fix potholes and build prisons, which may be worthy but aren't what the money was for ... It breaks the bond of faith between the Cultural Trust and its contributors, through no fault of the trust, because of actions by the Legislature."
I believe the Meyer Trust is still the largest private foundation in Oregon, so it will be interesting to see what kind of clout it has on this topic, should its leaders choose to lean on our legislators. I'd call in to the show, but I'll be driving to Salem in the morning on a non-arts related task involving armed robbery (literally), on which I will report later. (How's that for a teaser)?
Also, our friends at the Regional Arts and Culture Council(RACC) and the new Creative Advocacy Network (CAN) are calling for arts advocates to show up at City Hall on Thursday, March 12, 2008 (2:00 to 3:00 pm) to lend moral support as RACC gives its “State of the Arts” presentation to City Council. I suspect the turnout will be high and folks will be pumped up -- one positive legacy of the Cultural Trust debacle.
Labels:
advocacy,
arts support,
grants,
Oregon Cultural Trust,
RACC
Art to Come
Posted by
culturejock
on
Tuesday, December 16, 2008
Figure 1: Let's look into our crystal ball, shall we?
Figure 2: The Crystal Ballroom, site of the Portland Jazz Orchestra's upcoming “Intricate Rhythms," one of 102 projects receiving funding for 2009.
While our friends at Art Scatter were shaking the money tree last Wednesday, the RACC Board was quietly approving record sums of grant funding for artistic projects in 2009. Now that artists and organizations have had time to receive their award letters (and rejections), I'm giddy to help announce the winners.
Actually, let me just link you to the full description of all projects that have received awards for the year ahead. This is one story that actually gets a fair amount of attention each year, as the media and bloggers have fun picking out the projects they are most excited to see. What's your favorite?
Two themes are especially noteworthy here, in my opinion. First, how many of these project grants would you guess are going to the "same old" groups vs. first-time winners? Would you believe 50-50? It's true.
Secondly, this is the most money ever awarded by RACC for project grants, and while the recipient artists and organizations have plenty to cheer about, I suspect it will trigger a few critical remarks from folks who think this a frivolous investment amidst serious economic woes. You'll notice that the press release was written to counter any such sentiment, but we as an arts community must be sure to respond swiftly and intelligently to any Letter to the Editor or other public document that ridicules these investments or calls for arts funding cuts. It's time to gear up for the spring budget cycle, and we have much work to do to maintain arts funding locally as well as renewing statewide arts funding, including the Oregon Cultural Trust, for the next biennium as well.
To arms!
Figure 2: The Crystal Ballroom, site of the Portland Jazz Orchestra's upcoming “Intricate Rhythms," one of 102 projects receiving funding for 2009.
While our friends at Art Scatter were shaking the money tree last Wednesday, the RACC Board was quietly approving record sums of grant funding for artistic projects in 2009. Now that artists and organizations have had time to receive their award letters (and rejections), I'm giddy to help announce the winners.
Actually, let me just link you to the full description of all projects that have received awards for the year ahead. This is one story that actually gets a fair amount of attention each year, as the media and bloggers have fun picking out the projects they are most excited to see. What's your favorite?
Two themes are especially noteworthy here, in my opinion. First, how many of these project grants would you guess are going to the "same old" groups vs. first-time winners? Would you believe 50-50? It's true.
Secondly, this is the most money ever awarded by RACC for project grants, and while the recipient artists and organizations have plenty to cheer about, I suspect it will trigger a few critical remarks from folks who think this a frivolous investment amidst serious economic woes. You'll notice that the press release was written to counter any such sentiment, but we as an arts community must be sure to respond swiftly and intelligently to any Letter to the Editor or other public document that ridicules these investments or calls for arts funding cuts. It's time to gear up for the spring budget cycle, and we have much work to do to maintain arts funding locally as well as renewing statewide arts funding, including the Oregon Cultural Trust, for the next biennium as well.
To arms!
Labels:
artists,
arts education,
dance,
grants,
music,
neighborhoods,
RACC,
theater
And the 2008 Artists Fellowship Award goes to...
Posted by
culturejock
on
Thursday, September 25, 2008
It’s not a MacArthur Genius Grant like what has been discussed on Art Scatter this week, but RACC has just named its 2008 Fellow for Literature: Kim Stafford.
Flickr photo by Beyond Baroque
Stafford is, without question, a local treasure and a consummate storyteller. The son of former Oregon Poet Laureate William Stafford has certainly become one of the most important artists of our place and time, leaving profound impressions through poetry, prose, essays, children’s stories, and public art. He is also one of the most kind and generous artists I have ever met; even a simple letter for recommendation from the man brings instant understanding, inspiration and authenticity.
I also like what poet and novelist Naomi Shihab Nye says about Stafford: “He has an ability to be present to every moment he ever lives in – a native, original brilliance with language and imagery – a perfect sense of time – an endless appetite for deep listening – a wonderful sense of humor… a true belief in the powers of language to connect, not to divide.”
The RACC Fellowship Award for Literature includes a cash grant of $20,000, and in the year ahead Stafford plans to reduce his teaching time and other commitments to wander the city and engage residents in conversations. All will be documented in a series of essays entitled, “Pilgrim at Home: Local Encounters Beyond the Epoch of the Car” that will undoubtedly deepen our appreciation for the local experience that is Portland, Oregon. How cool is that?
Also, a shout out to Debra Gwartney, Mead Hunter, Karen Karbo, Renee Mitchell, Greg Netzer, Ellen Waterston, and Matt Yurdana who sat on the panel that selected Stafford for this award.
Here’s hoping that our colleagues at Art Scatter are compelled to abide.
Flickr photo by Beyond Baroque
Stafford is, without question, a local treasure and a consummate storyteller. The son of former Oregon Poet Laureate William Stafford has certainly become one of the most important artists of our place and time, leaving profound impressions through poetry, prose, essays, children’s stories, and public art. He is also one of the most kind and generous artists I have ever met; even a simple letter for recommendation from the man brings instant understanding, inspiration and authenticity.
I also like what poet and novelist Naomi Shihab Nye says about Stafford: “He has an ability to be present to every moment he ever lives in – a native, original brilliance with language and imagery – a perfect sense of time – an endless appetite for deep listening – a wonderful sense of humor… a true belief in the powers of language to connect, not to divide.”
The RACC Fellowship Award for Literature includes a cash grant of $20,000, and in the year ahead Stafford plans to reduce his teaching time and other commitments to wander the city and engage residents in conversations. All will be documented in a series of essays entitled, “Pilgrim at Home: Local Encounters Beyond the Epoch of the Car” that will undoubtedly deepen our appreciation for the local experience that is Portland, Oregon. How cool is that?
Also, a shout out to Debra Gwartney, Mead Hunter, Karen Karbo, Renee Mitchell, Greg Netzer, Ellen Waterston, and Matt Yurdana who sat on the panel that selected Stafford for this award.
Here’s hoping that our colleagues at Art Scatter are compelled to abide.
Cultural Planning: It's All the Rage
Posted by
culturejock
on
Thursday, September 04, 2008
As more and more cities recognize the economic, educational and social benefits of arts and culture, cultural plans are on the upswing. Portland had its own cultural plan in the '90s, and many of you will recall the laborious but productive effort that was "Arts Plan 2000." There hasn't been much comprehensive planning since, except for occasional check-ins on Arts Plan 2000, and check-offs of the strategies as they were accomplished. Work for Art, RACC's workplace giving program, was one of the last remaining items in the plan and we checked that one off in 2003. The other big thing that never DID happen: dedicated funding for arts and culture.
From time to time, RACC has tried to have that conversation -- how do we secure dedicated, reliable, and increased funding for arts and culture in the region -- but the timing has never been right. When I first started working on this issue in 2002-03, our school system was in crisis (you remember the Doonsbury cartoons) and there was no way people were going to fund the arts... we definitely needed to tend to our education system first. There was also no leadership from elected officials until -- you guessed it -- Sam Adams came along.
Over the past 16 months, Sam has led community leaders -- business owners, arts administrators, elected officials and other civic leaders throughout the region -- in a comprehensive planning process to uncover not only what our arts and culture organizations need, but what our entire community needs to do maintain (and improve) this strong, vibrant and unique place where innovation and creativity thrive in our schools and our businesses. The timing finally feels right, with people everywhere understanding that part of the reason our schools are not as good as they used to be is because we have stripped arts education out of them. Also, Portland has clearly attracted lots of creative talent over the past five years, and there is a keen awareness that the city will reap benefits if we can keep them here. And we keep talking about how our companies must innovate to succeed in the new economy; certainly arts and culture and right-brain thinking play a huge role in stimulating the power of imagination.
So with leadership from the top and a new mindset percolating in our communities, a bold new plan is in the works. It's dubbed "Creative Capacity," and you can see what's taking shape in the phase one report that was released earlier this week. The report highlights how public opinion polling has demonstrated more support for investing in arts and culture than some people might have expected. A few recommendations are starting to take shape.
In the weeks and months ahead, there will be many more town hall meetings, online surveys, and other ways for artists and arts-lovers to lend their voice to the direction we are headed. I definitely encourage folks to get involved now before the plan is cemented in December. Citizens can generally stay attuned to this effort -- and lend input -- through the project website, www.creativecapacity.org.
And oh, by the way, Portland's not alone in conducting this kind of assessment. The City of Austin did some nice cultural planning recently, and four cities released some kind of cultural plan in the last week: Greensboro, NC; Ft. Collins, CO; Denver; and Concord, NH. No doubt many more cities' plans are in the works!
From time to time, RACC has tried to have that conversation -- how do we secure dedicated, reliable, and increased funding for arts and culture in the region -- but the timing has never been right. When I first started working on this issue in 2002-03, our school system was in crisis (you remember the Doonsbury cartoons) and there was no way people were going to fund the arts... we definitely needed to tend to our education system first. There was also no leadership from elected officials until -- you guessed it -- Sam Adams came along.
Over the past 16 months, Sam has led community leaders -- business owners, arts administrators, elected officials and other civic leaders throughout the region -- in a comprehensive planning process to uncover not only what our arts and culture organizations need, but what our entire community needs to do maintain (and improve) this strong, vibrant and unique place where innovation and creativity thrive in our schools and our businesses. The timing finally feels right, with people everywhere understanding that part of the reason our schools are not as good as they used to be is because we have stripped arts education out of them. Also, Portland has clearly attracted lots of creative talent over the past five years, and there is a keen awareness that the city will reap benefits if we can keep them here. And we keep talking about how our companies must innovate to succeed in the new economy; certainly arts and culture and right-brain thinking play a huge role in stimulating the power of imagination.
So with leadership from the top and a new mindset percolating in our communities, a bold new plan is in the works. It's dubbed "Creative Capacity," and you can see what's taking shape in the phase one report that was released earlier this week. The report highlights how public opinion polling has demonstrated more support for investing in arts and culture than some people might have expected. A few recommendations are starting to take shape.
In the weeks and months ahead, there will be many more town hall meetings, online surveys, and other ways for artists and arts-lovers to lend their voice to the direction we are headed. I definitely encourage folks to get involved now before the plan is cemented in December. Citizens can generally stay attuned to this effort -- and lend input -- through the project website, www.creativecapacity.org.
And oh, by the way, Portland's not alone in conducting this kind of assessment. The City of Austin did some nice cultural planning recently, and four cities released some kind of cultural plan in the last week: Greensboro, NC; Ft. Collins, CO; Denver; and Concord, NH. No doubt many more cities' plans are in the works!
Labels:
creative capacity,
cultural planning,
RACC,
Sam Adams
A Tale of Two Cities' Parks
Posted by
shobiz
on
Tuesday, August 26, 2008
Portland is widely regarded as having the most parks per capita of any American city. Or, at least I think that's right. Maybe it's most acres of parkland. Or, at the very least, we have both the biggest and the smallest parks of any U.S. city. I'm pretty sure that's true, because it is stated on a framed Portland promotional poster that I often see at my workplace. In the restroom, for some reason.
Anyway, it sure makes Portland sound like a great place. More parks must mean more places to relax, recreate, enjoy (or, possibly, insulate) oneself from the urban scenery, right? And I think that's all true and good. But, really, there's so much more to it than that.
Let me first explain that I grew up in a suburb of Denver known as Aurora. Aurora has plenty of parks. Even more so, Aurora has plenty of greenbelts. For those of you who did not spend half your lives out in some analogous McMansionburg, a greenbelt is typically a multi-acre swath of arid (at least in Aurora) land that has been set aside by the local municipality to be sodded with non-native grass, rigged with a sprinkler system, then mowed and manicured, by teams of groundskeepers on a weekly basis, into a state of lush perfection.
It goes without saying that all this watering and maintenance costs taxpayer money that some would argue could be better spent on schools and/or social services, but I digress. The establishment of these greenbelt areas is done, ostensibly, to keep the viral accretion of housing developments from covering every last square foot of available land, which would thereby render the suburbs so densely overbuilt as to be almost indistinguishable to its inhabitants from the more urban environs they left behind in the first place. (It's worth noting that even our most densely built and populated cities are regarded by some foreigners as spacious and full of breathing room. But again, I digress.)
So, Portland has lots of parks, and unlike those in my native Aurora, most of them here are truly great. As the father of a four-year-old, I have had many opportunities to appreciate how great so many of them are. However, within the past few days, I've had a couple of experiences that have taken that appreciation to a new -- dare I say, "arts & cultural" -- level.
First, on Saturday 8/23, I took my daughter, Ella, with some friends to the free Oregon Symphony in the Neighborhoods concert at Mt. Scott Park. It turned out that there was a lot more to see and do there than just the symphony. We saw and heard other kinds of music, played on the playground equipment, ate bratwurst and shave ice, joked and chatted with fellow Portlanders, and enjoyed the late-summer weather. But for me, the highlight was when I sat with my friends and watched Ella and several other young kids dancing in front of the Portland Taiko stage, the late evening sun streaming through the branches of tall conifers. It reminded me again why I'm so happy to be raising my daughter in a place so unlike that uncultured suburb where I grew up. It was incredible to see her exposed to the music of multiple cultures in the span of a few hours, while also reinforcing for her the feeling of being part of a community. Public shool funding issues notwithstanding, I can't imagine a better environment to raise a child.
If this were an unusual occurrence, I wouldn't make such a claim, but the truth is, Portland affords kids and adults these kinds of opportunities all the time. I can't believe how often we've found ourselves at street fairs, waterfront festivals or neighborhood celebrations, watching local musicians and performers, and feeling so grateful for the community we live in. There was even a rather touching article about the Mt. Scott event in The Oregonian, which featured a photo of Ella dancing her taiko dance.
A similarly sublime feeling came over me again tonight, when the Regional Arts & Culture Council held its annual staff picnic in Irving Park. This is yet another beautifully wooded park, in this case filled with stately old oaks, which served as a positively lovely place for our growing family of RACC staff members and their spouses/partners and children to relax, have fun, and reflect on the past year's accomplishments together. There was ample well-maintained space for the kids to frolic, for the adults to enjoy treats of the charcoal-grilled as well as ethanol-enhanced variety, and for everyone to feel content to let their hair down on a temperate August evening.
As with the greenbelts and parks of Aurora, Colorado, I am sure we pay a sizeable chunk of our taxes to keep these urban oases safe and in good condition. But on those broad, vacant suburban greenbelts, I never once saw musicians playing, kids dancing, or people enjoying a summer evening in the company of their friends and fellow citizens. I couldn't be happier or more proud to be a resident of Portland for going on ten years now, and hopefully for many more to come.
Updated 08-27-08: I think I may have defined the term "greenbelt" incorrectly. Having read something about greenbelts today, I found that the term usually applies to urban or urban-adjacent land that remains largely undeveloped for various ecological purposes. That actually sounds like a great idea, but it leaves me even more confused about the large stretches of well-maintained lawn that I've seen in some suburban areas, usually running alongside roads or canals. They don't quite qualify as parks, so what are they? Maybe they're "greenways," although I'm also fuzzy on what that means exactly. My qwest for knowledge continues....
Anyway, it sure makes Portland sound like a great place. More parks must mean more places to relax, recreate, enjoy (or, possibly, insulate) oneself from the urban scenery, right? And I think that's all true and good. But, really, there's so much more to it than that.
Let me first explain that I grew up in a suburb of Denver known as Aurora. Aurora has plenty of parks. Even more so, Aurora has plenty of greenbelts. For those of you who did not spend half your lives out in some analogous McMansionburg, a greenbelt is typically a multi-acre swath of arid (at least in Aurora) land that has been set aside by the local municipality to be sodded with non-native grass, rigged with a sprinkler system, then mowed and manicured, by teams of groundskeepers on a weekly basis, into a state of lush perfection.
It goes without saying that all this watering and maintenance costs taxpayer money that some would argue could be better spent on schools and/or social services, but I digress. The establishment of these greenbelt areas is done, ostensibly, to keep the viral accretion of housing developments from covering every last square foot of available land, which would thereby render the suburbs so densely overbuilt as to be almost indistinguishable to its inhabitants from the more urban environs they left behind in the first place. (It's worth noting that even our most densely built and populated cities are regarded by some foreigners as spacious and full of breathing room. But again, I digress.)
So, Portland has lots of parks, and unlike those in my native Aurora, most of them here are truly great. As the father of a four-year-old, I have had many opportunities to appreciate how great so many of them are. However, within the past few days, I've had a couple of experiences that have taken that appreciation to a new -- dare I say, "arts & cultural" -- level.
First, on Saturday 8/23, I took my daughter, Ella, with some friends to the free Oregon Symphony in the Neighborhoods concert at Mt. Scott Park. It turned out that there was a lot more to see and do there than just the symphony. We saw and heard other kinds of music, played on the playground equipment, ate bratwurst and shave ice, joked and chatted with fellow Portlanders, and enjoyed the late-summer weather. But for me, the highlight was when I sat with my friends and watched Ella and several other young kids dancing in front of the Portland Taiko stage, the late evening sun streaming through the branches of tall conifers. It reminded me again why I'm so happy to be raising my daughter in a place so unlike that uncultured suburb where I grew up. It was incredible to see her exposed to the music of multiple cultures in the span of a few hours, while also reinforcing for her the feeling of being part of a community. Public shool funding issues notwithstanding, I can't imagine a better environment to raise a child.
If this were an unusual occurrence, I wouldn't make such a claim, but the truth is, Portland affords kids and adults these kinds of opportunities all the time. I can't believe how often we've found ourselves at street fairs, waterfront festivals or neighborhood celebrations, watching local musicians and performers, and feeling so grateful for the community we live in. There was even a rather touching article about the Mt. Scott event in The Oregonian, which featured a photo of Ella dancing her taiko dance.
A similarly sublime feeling came over me again tonight, when the Regional Arts & Culture Council held its annual staff picnic in Irving Park. This is yet another beautifully wooded park, in this case filled with stately old oaks, which served as a positively lovely place for our growing family of RACC staff members and their spouses/partners and children to relax, have fun, and reflect on the past year's accomplishments together. There was ample well-maintained space for the kids to frolic, for the adults to enjoy treats of the charcoal-grilled as well as ethanol-enhanced variety, and for everyone to feel content to let their hair down on a temperate August evening.
As with the greenbelts and parks of Aurora, Colorado, I am sure we pay a sizeable chunk of our taxes to keep these urban oases safe and in good condition. But on those broad, vacant suburban greenbelts, I never once saw musicians playing, kids dancing, or people enjoying a summer evening in the company of their friends and fellow citizens. I couldn't be happier or more proud to be a resident of Portland for going on ten years now, and hopefully for many more to come.
Updated 08-27-08: I think I may have defined the term "greenbelt" incorrectly. Having read something about greenbelts today, I found that the term usually applies to urban or urban-adjacent land that remains largely undeveloped for various ecological purposes. That actually sounds like a great idea, but it leaves me even more confused about the large stretches of well-maintained lawn that I've seen in some suburban areas, usually running alongside roads or canals. They don't quite qualify as parks, so what are they? Maybe they're "greenways," although I'm also fuzzy on what that means exactly. My qwest for knowledge continues....
Labels:
parks,
Portland free stuff,
RACC
Ka-ching!
Posted by
culturejock
on
Friday, August 01, 2008
Summer is a time when public funds -- and private donations generated by publicly-subsidized initiatives -- start flowing into the hands of our local arts organizations. The Oregon Arts Commission was first out of the gate, announcing $1.2 million in statewide grants on July 2.
Earlier this week, RACC announced $1.5 million worth of grants for arts organizations the Portland tri-county area -- which includes funds from local governments plus proceeds from last year's Work for Art campaign.
And I have just come from an event at the PCPA where Nick Fish, vice Chair of the Oregon Cultural Trust (and our newest arts-loving Portland City Commissioner) announced $1.6 million in grants for 59 arts organizations across the state. These grants are made possible because thousands of Oregonians made contributions to the Oregon Cultural Trust this past year in exchange for a tax credit (up to $500). Not a tax deduction, a tax credit. Great program!
Nick Fish (at podium) and representatives from the organizations receiving Oregon Cultural Trust grants this year.
Together, these funds provide vital working capital for our arts organizations as they set out to do all of their great work in the year ahead. Take Portland Center Stage for example: from these three sources PCS receives a combined $120,000 -- and that's no small chunk of change. The impacts are even more significant for a smaller organization like Write Around Portland, which received a combined $28,000 from these three sources this year. That's 15% of their budget! No doubt we are all in store for some great performances, exhibits, and other arts programs this year.
Earlier this week, RACC announced $1.5 million worth of grants for arts organizations the Portland tri-county area -- which includes funds from local governments plus proceeds from last year's Work for Art campaign.
And I have just come from an event at the PCPA where Nick Fish, vice Chair of the Oregon Cultural Trust (and our newest arts-loving Portland City Commissioner) announced $1.6 million in grants for 59 arts organizations across the state. These grants are made possible because thousands of Oregonians made contributions to the Oregon Cultural Trust this past year in exchange for a tax credit (up to $500). Not a tax deduction, a tax credit. Great program!
Nick Fish (at podium) and representatives from the organizations receiving Oregon Cultural Trust grants this year.
Together, these funds provide vital working capital for our arts organizations as they set out to do all of their great work in the year ahead. Take Portland Center Stage for example: from these three sources PCS receives a combined $120,000 -- and that's no small chunk of change. The impacts are even more significant for a smaller organization like Write Around Portland, which received a combined $28,000 from these three sources this year. That's 15% of their budget! No doubt we are all in store for some great performances, exhibits, and other arts programs this year.
Labels:
grants,
OAC,
Oregon Cultural Trust,
RACC
Dragon? What Dragon?
Posted by
culturejock
on
Tuesday, July 29, 2008
Surely you remember the brouhaha that ensued when a "culturally offensive" public artwork was unveiled in Old Town/Chinatown in the winter of ought-seven. If not, you can take this trip down memory lane and also here.
But right now, as I type this, artist Brian Goldbloom and a crew from RACC are installing some of the additional “Illumination” sculptures that were commissioned for the PDC festival street improvements on NW 3rd and 4th Avenue years ago, but have gone unfinished while a remedy was sought. Today's installation includes a more generic topstone replacement for the original carved granite dragon, which had offended many with its improper downfacing position and collared appearance. The original carving was returned to the artist.
One of these two "lanterns" used to have a dragon head in it. Now they're plain "topstones."
Two final components will be installed in the fall, along with interpretive plaques that help describe the 8 different granite base blocks representing the many ethnic communities that have concentrated in this neighborhood over the years. Check out Blogtown PDX for some good additional information, and photos.
But right now, as I type this, artist Brian Goldbloom and a crew from RACC are installing some of the additional “Illumination” sculptures that were commissioned for the PDC festival street improvements on NW 3rd and 4th Avenue years ago, but have gone unfinished while a remedy was sought. Today's installation includes a more generic topstone replacement for the original carved granite dragon, which had offended many with its improper downfacing position and collared appearance. The original carving was returned to the artist.
One of these two "lanterns" used to have a dragon head in it. Now they're plain "topstones."
Two final components will be installed in the fall, along with interpretive plaques that help describe the 8 different granite base blocks representing the many ethnic communities that have concentrated in this neighborhood over the years. Check out Blogtown PDX for some good additional information, and photos.
Labels:
public art,
RACC
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)