Since graduating, I've been trying to re-learn the pleasures of reading. In other words, rather than directly tackling books through critical analysis and matters of deconstruction, I want to read a book for itself, to take in, articulate dancing letters, to re-imagine, re-discover why I love literature. It's gonna be a long process, but I hope I can one day explain exactly why I like a particular book without looking for a theoretical back-up claim.
Here's a really good article about literature:
"In short, it’s about subjectivity finding its assignations within material space and transmitted (or occluded) history, experience being dragged and catapulted along their ineluctably death-driven arcs.
Literature, in short, is not made up of ‘characters’: it understands that existence, whether individual or collective, is formed and unformed within networks of language and ceremony, spread across topographies whose axes, or gravitational force-fields, are law, pleasure and mortality, subject to the exigencies of topography itself. As such, it offers, at its deepest, neither commentary nor entertainment; rather, it is the very source-code of our being, index of its contingencies."
Remember Freud, Tom McCarthy
http://surplusmatter.com/writings/the-source-code-of-our-being/