On Friday afternoon we returned to the hospital at Voorburg to discuss the next steps of our ICSI treatment with the gynaecologist. We went with open minds following our latest insights from our trip to Gent and we happy to see that the gynaecologist followed suit.
Flo's menstrual cycle is back into its regular swing following the last treatment, which is good news since this offsets the problems with Flo not producing many eggs during each treatment. The gynaecologist gave Flo a quick ultra-sound scan and commented on her having a perfect uterus, another good sign. While Flo was putting her clothes back on, I asked the gynaecologist whether Flo had any more cysts and as he started to give me an explanation about the difference between a cyst and a follicle with an egg, Flo came hopping back into the room frantic to hear what he was saying. Apparently, a cyst is just a follicle without an egg, so it's quite common to see them. The problem only arises when the eggless follicle becomes too big, but in Flo's case it was looking OK.
Although making a point that our chances of successful fertilisation are lower than normal given that Flo is likely to produce less than ten eggs during stimulation, he was optimistic that, given the right protocol, we could still have a reasonable chance. He agreed that the protocols that we'd tried to date were not the best given our specific circumstances and he proposed a cycle selection and an antagonist protocol.
Cycle selection means we do some blood tests at the start of each menstrual cycle and only commit to stimulation and treatment if everything is looking good. Of course, looking good is a relative term and what this means is that Flo's uterus and ovaries are in good condition (no cysts and enough follicles) and that Flo's hormone levels are looking good. The really encouraging news was that the gynaecologist stated that, if things look consecutively sub-optimal for a few months in a row, that we stop for a few months and then take another look later to see if things have changed. The idea being that fertillity cycles, with peaks and troughs and that the time that we're doing the test may be in a natural trough. So coming back in a few months may give the body time to peak again.
Another thing that suprised us was the gynaecologist's willingness to try the antagonist protocol, despite the fact that it may mean carrying out the actual ICSI procedure during the weekend. Previously, he had stated that the hospital lab does not operate at the weekends which is one of the reasons that they prefer down-regulating, since it gives them more control over when the puncture will be performed and they can time it to occur during the week. He was now stating however that, although they prefer not to use the antagonist protocol, but in our case it was obvious that this was the best treatment and that, if the lab had to come in and work during the weekend, then so be it.
So, we couldn't have hoped for a better consultation really. We're getting what we want plus the gynaecologist is fully supportive of the procedure. So the next step is to perform some blood tests at the start of Flo's next menstruation. Unfortunately (well, sort of), we're probably going to still be on holiday at the start of the next menstruation, so we'll have to wait until April before heading back for the tests. But after waiting this long, another month is not going to hurt and I think going away for a much deserved holiday will only have beneficial effects for body and mind and set us in good stead to get back into the baby project!