Wednesday, September 28, 2011

Something about love

When the blog is not updated, it usually means that my days are flying too fast.
Is being single really that tormenting?
It seems like love has be socially constructed to be romantic love and one must experience the fiery passions of romance, if not, one's life is not worth living.
I can almost hear somebody echoing the advantages of being single (spend less money, more free time, I think I should list more substantial support for this side. Ha ha) and of course the wonders of being in a relationship. (emotionally, physically, sexual LOL)
I shall summon some food for thought:
Fall in love. Many times. Make mistakes when you are young. After all, without the experience, how are you going to know which is the right one?
Just wait for the right one. Some things need time. Or fate. You cannot rush into relationships. Maybe you are not mature enough yet.
It is better to have loved and lost, than to never love at all.

Actually I should really be do my 25% tutorial. Good night.

Thursday, September 15, 2011

Philosophy?

If an all-knowing, all-powerful and benevolent god exists, why is there still suffering in the world?

Here's my answer, restricted to 200 words:


I would argue using Plantinga’s freewill argument: a world whereby freewill exists is more morally valuable than one where it doesn't, as the act of choosing to do good should outweigh the other act where one is forced to do good. I refer to moral evil, which is the suffering caused by the action or inaction of human beings. Beings with freewill can choose to do good or evil freely. If they choose to do evil and they are prevented from doing so, then it is not considered freewill at all. There is suffering now as some choose to commit evil. The argument is that God cannot create a world where freewill exists and people all choose not to do evil, or perhaps we have not advanced morally there yet. Hence, God has created a valuable world with freewill in exchange for suffering, for now.

The problem comes from it not addressing the problem of natural evil, which is the evil whereby suffering occurs from natural events like earthquake. We cannot say that nature has freewill and choose to do good or evil, or rather choose to have earthquakes or not. Thus, it only solves the problem of moral evils.

Monday, September 12, 2011

FOW2

Since I sort of left my post hanging previously, I shall carry on from there.
Plus, its 25% of my grade, I should explore writing and ASK FOR FEEDBACK!
So please give as generously as you can.
:)

1. What demands does the performance of FOW put on to the audience?

At the beginning and at the end of FOW, the audience have to believe that everything that was happening was real, that it was not part of the play itself. If not, the "magic" was lost. The audience will not be left with the same experience as one who went through the play not knowing anything.

For example, the audience came with the pretext of knowing that the playwright hasn't written a play in ten years and this play should be quite special. Right from the start, the audience was playfully teased that the play might be potentially extreme; it is what the playwright wanted to write but was afraid of writing. We were told that the play was cancelled as too many revisions was made, it was now changed to a private party, complete with food and disco ball. This was in context that MDA has to approved a play before they can stage it in Singapore. All the money given would be treated as a donation and they even stamped us like going to Zouk like that. Somebody even asked if this was illegal and would we, as audience, be implicated in this? The answer was no, complete with another example a few years back that was done similarly was well. So after all the hype, we entered the area!

2. What was your experience as an audience member in FOW? Was it a difficult experience? Discuss with examples.

The seating area wasn't the normal kind. We could sit anywhere we wanted. This meant that the actors frequently would be frolicking among the audience and you could be turn your head in every single directions the whole play to capture everything. Well, the play started with quite a few stories intertwining with each other. I would say that there wasn't one main character but many different ones portrayed. Some of the stories that stood out were: a writer that wanted to write about Chee Soon Juan but was too afraid of the consequences, his fellow academic who advised him to write about LKY, the musical instead. The funny parts were how they said they have to use initials which cannot stand for the real thing, but everybody will know anyway and writing about the earlier person would be too provocative. And then there was this Singaporean, who I supposed just represented a normal working Singaporean, who met Chee Soon Juan who was selling his books and their interactions. And of course, there was the sarcastic news caster who spewed political sarcasm like no tomorrow.

Other than that, there was also times where the actors seemed to meld into "voices" just saying the same lines over and over again, as if to create a haunting effect on the audience. This occurred often with lines that potentially had the most impact. For example, they started talking about a faint smell that only they could smell, just barely there, and nobody else seemed to be doing anything about it, and it was disturbing to them. It was difficult in a sense that the actors keep shifting in the space and their characters were always changing. It sort of created a dynamic play whereby, they play many roles and nobody is what they seemed.

However, about 3/4 into the play, because it just seemed to be this and nothing new, I kinda got a bit bored and wondered if there was anything more to this. Perhaps this was the intended meaning, since the play got interrupted then. The MDA came in, and stopped the whole play. The actors break out of their character and had to handle them. Due to potentially politically dangerous material, they were not allowed to continue with the play. Shout here, shout there. The personnel wanted to round everybody up since by participated in the show, we were all implicated and they wanted our details. Nobody went actually. The policemen got involved to ensure order and some members of the audience started questioning the personnel. Even one Auntie took out her phone and started filming the whole process (she was asked to hand over the material though). And to continue the drama, they continued to ask people to go to write down their information. Just when it seems a fight was about to break out, the lights went off, and the play concluded. Everyone clapped. (P.S all the members of the audience who had interacted with the cast were all planted members, including the one in the beginning who asked if this was illegal)

3. Martin Esslin writes, “… it is the spectator’s imagination that produces the final effect, the ultimate meaning, if indeed meaning is to be the end of the experience, rather than mere idle entertainment” (134) Evaluate this statement with reference to your experience as an audience member in FOW.

So yea, in my mind, I was like thinking, oh man, how am I going to critique this? The End.

Friday, September 9, 2011

FOW

FOW is a play I watch for my module.
I don't wish to use the exact name of the play or the module because I don't wish for it to link from Google or something.

Anyway, the essay that I need to write about this play will constitute 25% of the marks for the module.
Oh my god, isn't that exciting?

So yea, I want to capture down some lingering thoughts before everything goes to waste.
I thought the FOW was good, it has been a long time since I watched such a play.
First, the play starts without you knowing that it has started, and starts to draw you in slowly. (pardon the many starts)
And when you least expects it, the whole carpet is pulled from below and surprise! Although it can fail at times, and the whole scenario is hard to pull off, but one really does marvel at the thought that goes into it.

I like the idea of a play within a play within a play (maybe there was only 2) or the fact that the actors were playing themselves at the same time. Oh shit too tired. Carry on tmr. -.-

Monday, September 5, 2011

Operation Brand New Start

OBNS sounds stupid but it will work for now.
I guess there's no point to keep dwelling on something negative.
Positivism should be key here.
Whatever happened to Embracing Life lol.
Come on, lets kick off to a amazing start.

Increasingly, I find that StAJe is having more activities as a group now and I like it. Not necessary everyone was there, although for important events we try to come together as a whole. Like birthdays. I like how despite going different universities, courses, timetables, and such. Some may have their stuff to do at times, but I am just glad that the ties that tie us are there. Sorry for the multiple times I have been late, glad for the crappy shit that you guys continue to take from me, and of course, all the fun times.

Weeks that fly by fast

Finding myself within this chaotic mess.