Showing posts with label drugs. Show all posts
Showing posts with label drugs. Show all posts

Health or Something Else?

Courtesy ANH-UK
Read a very interesting and related article -

A New York spider gave me an insight into US private healthcare

Occupy Wall Street is right – a rash of bites showed me how private healthcare keeps Americans cowed and compliant


http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/dec/04/new-york-spider-us-private-healthcare

Adverse Drug Events in Seniors




A new set of criteria for identifying potentially hazardous medications in elderly patients accurately predicted serious adverse drug events, a prospective study found.

from Natural Health News

Jun 01, 2011
And in another story that tells you how how hospitals are seriously low in their supply of prescription drugs, you should have your contingency plan. Natural Health is here to help you. ... Our Health Forensics service may be of help to you , or the many of our acclaimed educational programs from The Oake Centre for natural health education. Posted by herbalYODA at 08:12 ·
May 29, 2010
Health Forensics offers drug nutrient depletion information and interaction review services. This information is provided by Creating Health Institute through our Health Matters(c) project.
May 12, 2010
Contact us for more information: we've been educating folks on how to get well and stay healthy naturally for decades through our "Healthy Options" programs and our " Health Matters" publishing. Our "Health Forensics" and "Health ...
Jan 24, 2010
Our Health Forensics (c) model covers these concerns as part of the health coaching we have done for 30+ years. From a Medco Health Solutions survey of seniors 65 and older who take medications. [Note that 20% of insured seniors did not ...
Dec 17, 2009
Every day I spend quite a good amount of time reading journals and health news. I am sure there are others who skim along the news stories and collect a armoire of artilces to post on their various aggregator sites. I think this has become the so-called current ... This quandary over how bad things have become led me to develop the system I use called Health Forensics©, and our 'ASK' and Health Detective© levels of service. The same quandary led me to a decision for 2010. ...
Dec 11, 2009
In my work as a health advocate for many years this is the most common issue I work with for my clients. It is also one reason why I developed "Health Forensics". The Seattle PI, one host of my "Natural Notes" blog also hosts this one ...
Jun 07, 2011
And you'll see why I developed HEALTH FORENSICS as an extremely effective system to help you fine "the new road to health". You'll note recent posts regarding the Food Pyramid and "The Plate" as well as coverage of ...
Jun 01, 2010
Did you ever consider that poor nutrition, the no-fat/lo-fat diet, and hormone imbalance might also be a factor that your health provider is overlooking in regard to your mood? Consider "Health Forensics". ...
Jun 01, 2010
We are offering a free "Health Forensics" consultation to the winner of our June event. For every donation you make to CHI, publisher of Natural Health News, between June 1 and June 13, you'll get one entry for a chance to win a ...


The chance of an avoidable adverse event occurring was significantly greater when medication use was evaluated with the criteria known as STOPP (Screening Tool of Older Persons' potentially inappropriate Prescriptions), with an odds ratio of 1.847 (95% CI 1.506 to 2.264, P<0.001), according to Denis O'Mahony, MD and colleagues from University College Cork in Ireland.
In contrast, use of the traditional Beers criteria did not predict the risk of adverse medication-associated events (OR 1.276, 95% CI 0.945 to 1.722, P=0.11), the researchers reported in the June 13 issue of the Archives of Internal Medicine.
The Beers criteria, in use for two decades, are based on two lists of drugs that should not be used in older patients, specifically drugs that should be avoided in all older patients and those that should be avoided in patients with specific conditions.
These criteria have been criticized, however, and studies incorporating them have shown conflicting associations with adverse event outcomes.
The importance of being able to identify the use of potentially inappropriate medications in the elderly, according to the researchers, is that adverse drug events today represent the fifth leading cause of death among people in the U.S.
O'Mahony's group developed and validated the STOPP criteria, which focus on potentially inappropriate medications that are in wide use, incorporating drug interactions and duplications.
According to STOPP criteria, the most commonly used inappropriate medications were:
  • Full therapeutic dosage of proton pump inhibitors for longer than eight weeks in patients with uncomplicated ulcers
  • Aspirin in patients with no history of coronary, cerebral, or peripheral vascular symptoms or occlusive arterial events

The most common in the Beers set were:
  • Short- to intermediate-term benzodiazepines in patients with a history of falls
  • Long-term benzodiazepines and tricyclic antidepressants in patients with a history of depression

To compare the overall accuracy of the STOPP and Beers criteria, as well as the ability to identify adverse drug events that lead to hospitalization, the researchers prospectively evaluated 600 consecutive patients, ages 65 and older, admitted for treatment of an acute illness.
Patients' median age was 77, and more than half were women.
They had been prescribed a total of 4,523 medications for a median of seven per patient.
According to the STOPP criteria, 610 potentially inappropriate drugs had been prescribed in 56.2% of patients, compared with 235 potentially hazardous drugs in 28.8% of patients using the Beers criteria.
When the researchers looked at adverse events in the cohort, they identified 329 potentially serious events in 26.3% of patients, with 10.9% being the main cause of patients' hospitalization.
An additional 55.6% of the events were considered to have contributed significantly to the need for hospitalization.
A total of 51.7% of the adverse events related to drugs included in the STOPP criteria, compared with 20.4% for the Beers criteria (P<0.01).
In addition, among the 71.4% of the adverse events considered avoidable, 67.7% were included in the STOPP criteria compared with 28.5% in Beers criteria (P<0.001).
"The present study results indicate that STOPP criteria are more sensitive to [potentially inappropriate medications] that result in [adverse drug events] than Beers criteria and are therefore more clinically relevant," O'Mahony's group stated.
Limitations of the study included the lack of information on over-the-counter drug use and on the duration of use of potentially risky medications.
In the same issue of the Archives, Alessandro Morandi, MD, of Vanderbilt University in Nashville, Tenn., and colleagues reported on a prospective cohort study that looked at prescription of medications before and during hospital admission.
Among 120 patients (median age 68), the percentage of patients taking at least one potentially inappropriate medication rose from 66% at admission to 85% at discharge.
Morandi and colleagues also determined that half of these medications were first prescribed in the intensive care unit.
"While it is possible that these drug therapies may be appropriate when started during the course of an acute illness in the ICU (e.g., stress ulcer prophylaxis with H2 antagonists in mechanically ventilated patients), most should have been discontinued at ICU and/or hospital discharge," they stated.
In an invited commentary, Jeffrey L. Schnipper, MD, MPH, of Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston, decried the current inadequacy of implementation of available tools for assessing medication safety.
Advances in safe medication use, Schnipper wrote, won't simply be a matter of new technology such as tools that can automatically alert clinicians of potentially inappropriate medications.
"Also required is process redesign that effectively incorporates these tools into work flow, monitors the impact on patient care, and allows for iterative refinement," he argued.
Furthermore, research should focus on "multifaceted interventions in real healthcare settings so that gains in medication safety can be widely and successfully spread," Schnipper concluded.
The STOPP study was supported by The Health Research Board of Ireland and Enterprise Ireland.
All authors and the editorialist had no financial disclosures.
The second study received support from several sources, including the Veterans Administration and the National Institutes of Health. Two contributors disclosed receiving honoraria from Pfizer, GlaxoSmithKline, Lilly, Hospira, and Aspect.

Why you might want to avoid Flonase

The TV ads are heavy hitting right now for anti-allergy drugs.

Here's what you can lose with one as an example.

Flonase® (fluticasone - 'flu' refers to fluoride in the chemical formula)


Prescribed for hay fever, asthma


Depletes: vitamin A, folic acid, vitamin B6, vitamin C, vitamin D, vitamin K, calcium, magnesium, potassium, selenium, zinc, melatonin.

Natural antihistamines are vitamin C and nettle, and they do not act to destroy your natural defenses.


Top 10 Drugs: Violence and more Fluoride

This of course to me is no surprise.  I have been writing about this issue since the Columbine shootings where some of these drugs were involved. Chantix has been covered at Natural Health News since 2008.  SSRIs/SNRIs are mentioned in 30+ posts. We're providing this information so you can be aware.
10. Desvenlafaxine (Pristiq) An antidepressant which affects both serotonin and noradrenaline, this drug is 7.9 times more likely to be associated with violence than other drugs.
9. Venlafaxine (Effexor) A drug related to Pristiq in the same class of antidepressants, both are also used to treat anxiety disorders. Effexor is 8.3 times more likely than other drugs to be related to violent behavior.

8. Fluvoxamine (Luvox) An antidepressant that affects serotonin (SSRI), Luvox is 8.4 times more likely than other medications to be linked with violence
7. Triazolam (Halcion) A benzodiazepine which can be addictive, used to treat insomnia. Halcion is 8.7 times more likely to be linked with violence than other drugs, according to the study.
6) Atomoxetine (Strattera) Used to treat attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), Strattera affects the neurotransmitter noradrenaline and is 9 times more likely to be linked with violence compared to the average medication.
5) Mefoquine (Lariam) A treatment for malaria, Lariam has long been linked with reports of bizarre behavior. It is 9.5 times more likely to be linked with violence than other drugs.
4) Amphetamines: (Various) Amphetamines are used to treat ADHD and affect the brain's dopamine and noradrenaline systems. They are 9.6 times more likely to be linked to violence, compared to other drugs.
3) Paroxetine (Paxil) An SSRI antidepressant, Paxil is also linked with more severe withdrawal symptoms and a greater risk of birth defects compared to other medications in that class. It is 10.3 times more likely to be linked with violence compared to other drugs.

2) Fluoxetine (Prozac) The first well-known SSRI antidepressant, Prozac is 10.9 times more likely to be linked with violence in comparison with other medications.
1) Varenicline (Chantix) The anti-smoking medication Chantix affects the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor, which helps reduce craving for smoking. Unfortunately, it's 18 times more likely to be linked with violence compared to other drugs — by comparison, that number for Xyban is 3.9 and just 1.9 for nicotine replacement. Because Chantix is slightly superior in terms of quit rates in comparison to other drugs, it shouldn't necessarily be ruled out as an option for those trying to quit, however.
Related information about fluoride is found here as well, and now you know mainstream media is finally suggesting you have been getting too much.  Here are the 8 top true "conspiracy theories".  It is not just that fluoride harms your teeth, but it is wise to look at all the fluoride dental products you've been using in addition to your fluoridated water, drugs, foods, agriculture, home and garden products...
#1 High Levels Of Fluoride In Our Drinking Water Is Bad - Amazingly, the U.S. federal government has now come out and is lowering the "recommended amount" of fluoride in our drinking water for the first time in 50 years.  Of course it would be great if they just banned fluoride in our drinking water altogether, but for the government to even admit that high levels of fluoride could be a problem is a huge step.  In a recent article on CNN, it was reported that the federal government is now saying that high levels of fluoride in the water has now officially been linked with fluorosis....  Read the complete list here -
Good coverage of the Worst Pills of 2010 include more of the same as in the aforementioned articles.  Many of the drugs on this list have been reported here at Natural Health News in our effort to keep you educated and aware.
Prozac, Paxil, Zoloft, SSRIs
Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRIs) antidepressants like Prozac, Paxil, Zoloft and Lexapro probably did more to inflate drug industry profits than Viagra. But many say the drugs have also inflated police blotters. In addition to 4,200 published reports of SSRI-related violence, including the Columbine, Red Lake and NIU shootings, SSRIs can cause serotonin syndrome and gastrointestinal bleeding when taken with certain drugs. Paxil is linked to birth defects.
Effexor, Cymbalta, Pristiq, SNRIs
Selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) are like their SSRIs chemical cousins except their norepinephrine effects can modulate pain, which has ushered in your-depression-is-really-pain, your-pain-is-really-depression and other crossover marketing. SNRI's are also harder to quit than SSRIs. 739,000 web sites address "Effexor" and "withdrawal." 

Seroquel, Zyprexa, Geodon, atypical antipsychotics
The antipsychotic Seroquel tops 71 drugs on the FDA's January 2010 adverse event report and is linked to unexplained troop deaths and many research scandals. But it's the fifth biggest-selling drug in the world. Atypical antipsychotics cause weight gain and diabetes, the tardive dyskinesia they are marketed to prevent and death in the demented elderly. Yet FDA approved Zyprexa and Seroquel for children last year and the new atypical antipsychotic, Latuda this year. Maybe the FDA is bipolar.

Chantix
After 397 FDA cases of possible psychosis, 227 domestic reports of suicidal behaviors and 28 actual suicides, the government banned pilots, air-traffic controllers and interstate truck and bus drivers from taking the antismoking drug Chantix in 2008. Its neuropsychiatric effects were immortalized when New Bohemians musician Carter Albrecht was shot to death in 2007 in Texas by a neighbor after acting aggressively on the Chantix.

The Case of a Sequestered Mind

11 Jan, 2011 -  The list of psychopharmaceutical chemicals forced on my mother included Zyprexa, Celexa, Neurontin, Depakote, and Ativan,  Mind you, my mother suffered a closed head injury in 2003 and developed expressive aphasia.  She was never evaluated by a neurologist as I requested, nor did she have rehab or speech therapy. The drug interaction profile will tell you that many of these are NOT supposed to be given together, and the research tells you that Zyprexa is not for Elders, especially women. My younger brother, a MetLife salesman, refused to act to create a more beneficial care plan for her.


Now, a new report has been issued regarding new findings that many "prescriptions for the top-selling class of drugs, known as atypical antipsychotic medications, lack strong evidence that the drugs will actually help" and they are costing billions and "serious effects as weight gain, diabetes and heart disease..."

Too late for my mother, but not too late for you.




December 18, 2010 - Please refer to this recent Natural Health News post: Drug Death FDA and YOU http://naturalhealthnews.blogspot.com/2010/12/drug-death-fda-and-you.html


Truth telling seems to be the Mode O'Day with WikiLeaks being front and center in the news. In some small way this is one of my WikiLeak-type stories -


Imagine losing your ability to communicate following a closed head injury.  Imagine knowing that excellent neurological care is locally available in your community but the person with Power of Attorney over your care refuses a family member’s request to take you there.
On the surface this sounds cruel at the very least.  In the depths of this many-year saga it is very ugly.
Just the other day I was working on some drug information for a client in my Health Forensics® program.
At the same time I was listening to a very good discussion of problems with health care in the US, especially drugs that kill about 300,000 people annually, and posted an informative article on the subject to my blog.
This topic is very important to me because a related event happened in my family.
Given the fact I grew up I a medical family I had a different involvement than this brother, younger by seven years.  I went in to the medical field; he is a commissioned salesperson for a major insurance company offering annuities and mutual funds.
Sometime early in 2003, although I have never been told the exact date, my mother suffered a closed head injury. From what information I was able to scout out there was no definitive proof whether my mother fell and hit her head or experienced a stroke.
This brother was given power of attorney as the youngest, so my mother explained. When my mother called me to tell me this both my youngest daughter and I expressed concerns.  We suggested someone outside the family would be best.
As PoA, my brother took more than three months to contact me to tell me about the event.  During this time he either sold or removed all of my mother’s belongings, or gave items to other family members.  He never asked me if there were things I wanted, or that my mother wanted me to have: there were. 
After a very brief sentence or two I was told that my mother was at the same place where she had been living since a year after my father died, except in the nursing home division.
Even though I was experiencing shock because of the way the information was manipulated, I managed to order flowers and sent a card to my mother.  I called the facility to and to further exasperate the situation, the so-called “nurse” had no idea my mother had a daughter, and there was no mention of me in any of my mother’s records.
I did however manage to get a list of the drugs being prescribed to my mother, and found out who the attending doctors were.
Now for the third shock wave!  The list of drugs was so egregious and inappropriate I could not grasp what was happening.  Other than this being the typical way nursing homes, even the “5 star” rated one like this place, do things.  I hoped I’d find otherwise.
I phoned the GP internist.  He was not used to being asked questions so he complained to my brother.
Then I phoned the psychiatrist (another red flag) to ask about the drugs he was prescribing, seven to be exact.  I asked how he was able to diagnose my mother’s condition if she was experiencing aphasia.  He could not answer yet gave a diagnosis of depression.  He also diagnosed leg pain but could not explain why he gave Neurontin to someone who could not tell him if she had this complaint. Neurontin causes garbled speech among its other wonderful side effects; are you thinking what I thought?

Aphasia is an acquired communication disorder that impairs a person's ability to process language, but does not affect intelligence. Aphasia impairs the ability to speak and understand others, and most people with aphasia experience difficulty reading and writing. An Aphasia Therapy Program is an intensive communication program designed to improve communications skills, reconnect with those around them and attain a greater quality of life.  Based on recent studies, individuals with aphasia greatly benefit from treatment provided intensively over a short period of time. http://www.aphasia.org/docs/Bill%20of%20Rights.pdf 
I still couldn’t figure out why my mother did not have a neurologist as her primary provider.  When asked of the Director of Nursing, she said, “She had an MRI in the hospital, so she must have had one”.  She added later in our discussion that “…you know how those people are after they have a head injury” after I asked who was supplying prescription drugs to the facility and had they provided a drug interaction profile on the drugs prescribed for my mother.  She never answered this line of questions.
I ran a drug interaction profile the next day and again was shocked, so I called a colleague at the FDA who was one of their top pharmacologists.  He specialized in psychiatric drugs.
Politely he said, “This combination would knock out a healthy 30 year old!” and went on to express his real concerns.
I passed this on to my brother and asked that he take her to the neurologist for a real evaluation and to see that she received proper care, including speech therapy. 
Even though for the last couple of years he rails that I was unwilling to collaborate, my brother refused to take my mother to one of the top neurologists in the country.  He refused!  His excuses were 1) he would have to pay for her transportation there (not more than 5 miles one way with a nurse to accompany her), and 2) the nurse told him he would have to move her if she came off the drugs.
Not too long after this my mother was taken to the hospital for hip surgery following a fall.  The nursing director told me my mother would never fall because she had a “lap buddy”. 
A “lap buddy” can be a restrain, which requires an order, and it is to help prevent falls.  Whatever form used on my mother obviously did not protect her from falling and fracturing her hip, forcing her to be hospitalized and undergo surgery.
Now on opiates for pain, on top of her other sedating drugs (often used for staff convenience) what might be next?
The facility stopped sending me the drug data after this event.  To this day I still do not know if the Zyprexa given to my mother caused her to become diabetic.  My brother ignored the warning for suicidal ideation associated with Celexa (he believed drugs were necessary because my mother “tried to jump out a window”).  He too ignored the information I sent him stating clearly that Zyprexa is not for use with elderly patients, especially elderly women, and is a known cause of diabetes.
My little brother sees me as a trouble maker.  I see him as the thief who stole my mother’s mind.
If this is trouble making then I’m happy to continue providing Health Forensics® to all of the people who depend on me to help them understand the problems and nutritional deficiencies caused by drugs.
There is much more to this story.  I may tell it in the future.

DECEMBER 17, 2010,
What Happens When the Elderly Are Prescribed Antidepressants?

By Katherine Hobson

When you’re taking a lot of prescription medications, as many older adults do, there’s the potential for trouble.
An analysis of Medicare claims for 39,512 patients newly prescribed an antidepressant finds within a year, about a quarter filled other prescriptions for different antidepressants or other drugs that raised their risk for a major interaction. About 36% filled prescriptions for drugs that could cause moderate interactions, and about 39% filled prescriptions for drugs that risked minor or no complications.
More than 30% of those potentially major interactions involved pain meds, notably tramadol and oxycodone, according to the study, which was led by researchers from Thomson Reuters and published in the American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry.
The analysis also found that side effects can play a role in adherence; less than half of the Medicare enrollees who had documented side effects within a month of starting an antidepressant filled a second prescription for the drug. And about a fourth who had documented side effects ceased taking antidepressants altogether.
This is only a piece of the much bigger issue of how — and what — to prescribe to the elderly. A study published earlier this week in the Archives of Internal Medicine examined the safety of painkillers in older people and found that opioids raised the risk of adverse events compared to non-selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs such as ibuprofen. Here’s the WSJ story on the study.
In a JAMA commentary published in October, Jerry Avorn, of Harvard Medical School and Brigham & Women’s Hospital, calls medication use in older people “arguably the single most important health care intervention in the industrialized world.” He says the U.S. health-care system needs to change to address the issue, including a greater emphasis in medical education on prescribing to the elderly, better representation of older patients in clinical trials and more coordinated care.
Note:  Some years ago I had the wonderful experience of working with a chemist who had some 47 patents to his name.  I came to know him because my business had done some work at his home, and I later asked him to analyze a compound I was interested in manufacturing.  He had expressive aphasia resulting from a stroke.  With his cooperation, his wife’s help, and some ingenuity, we designed a program for him. He regained speech; something my brother never let my mother experience.


I've served in executive positions in nursing homes.  I understand the games that are played, especially when corporations look for profit over people.  I have been a whistleblower in several Federal Elder care fraud cases. A reason why I am unwilling to sell my soul for a paycheck as I felt was an issue at the Naples FL facility where my mother was sequestered for the last silenced six years of her life.


Neuroprotective Compounds

Drugs Don't Work!

FIVE OUT OF SIX NEW PRESCRIPTION DRUGS DON'T WORK, DOCTOR CLAIMS

This is an old and enduring fact!


Snippet-
Drug companies firms overstate the benefits of patented medicines, spend vast amounts on getting doctors to prescribe them and underplayed serious side-effects, says Prof Donald Light of the University of Medicine and Dentistry in New Jersey, US. When the "toxic side-effects" of prescription drugs were taken into account, and their misuse, he claimed they were "a significant cause of death". Cholesterol-lowering statins were a classic example of the drugs industry overselling a product as a wonder-pill to prevent heart attacks, despite evidence that they could do more harm than good. He said drug cos spend 2-3 x more on marketing than on research. He has written in both the Lancet & BMJ.

Edward Priestly comments: These sentiments have been expressed many times by experts including Dr. Allen Roses, Chief of Genetics at GlaxoSmithKline who said in Dec. 2003 to the world "Most Drugs Are a Waste of Time".
Complete Article