Monday, 23 December 2024

British Collectivism in A Fall of Moondust

While respected for his contribution to science fiction, Arthur C Clarke doesn't have the greatest contemporary critical reputation. His prose is often considered technical and dry, his character work limited, and his claims to hard SF long superseded by the likes of Stephen Baxter (who he collaborated with over the excellent The Light of Other Days, and a couple of others) and Greg Egan. Even his best known works, that includes 2001: A Space Odyssey, Rendezvous with Rama, and Childhood's End are often criticised for being boring and dull. If you want high adventure and drama, best go elsewhere.

My expectations weren't very high for A Fall of Moondust, a Poseidon Adventure-style rescue caper set on the lunar surface. The plot is not the world's most riveting either. With space travel between the Earth and the permanent Moon colony a fixture of the 21st century, space tourism is a thing and punters happily shell out the cash for cruises across the lunar surface. For Captain Pat Harris and hostess Sue Wilkins, the latest foray across the sea of dust in the skimmer, Selene, is another routine sightseeing trip. Unfortunately, as they're speeding across the sea an underground expulsion of gas creates a sinkhole analogue just as they're passing over. The ship is immediately buried without nary a trace of it left on the surface. Facing problems with heat, air, and supplies, can the crew and passengers hold out until they are rescued? On the Moon, is rescue even possible?

Fall is not the most sophisticated novel, but it is a very good one. Shock horror a break with the consensus! The usual criticisms about character apply, and because it's 1961, the gender norms and a quick racial aside dates it. But as a straightforward SF thriller, it works. Taken on his own terms, for Clarke science fiction was the literature of exploration - a thought experiment of fantastic but just-about-plausible scenarios and conceivable future tech within the limits of the science of his day. Fall works as the mapping out of how a disaster might unfold on the Moon, and what engineering challenges would have to be overcome to pull off a successful rescue in hard vacuum. A lot of Clarke's description of the environment and geology was well realised, and perhaps his speculation did have an affect on NASA planners who were worried the Apollo landers might sink into the dust.

But what I took from Fall was a distillation of the postwar zeitgeist. The economic boom, the rapidly rising living standards across the West, the celebration of expertise in popular culture and the can-do resolution of problems through the application of science and technology suffuses the book. It also works as a paean to the lost world of collectivism in the British mode. The Selene's crew are unflappable, not given to panic, and see the safety of the passengers as their first duty. The engineering team that rush to the crash site are protected from the glare of global media interest by the distance between themselves and the TV cameras on a nearby mountain, and the anonymising sun shades of their space suits. There is no hyping up of the individual, despite one of the passengers being a famous astronaut travelling incognito, and life after Selene is not one of celebrity and media deals. This was simply a group of people pulling together and doing what was expected of them with a minimum of fuss, and then getting on with their lives. A reminder that an unshowy, cooperative individualism is a submerged - as if buried under tonnes of Moon dust - part of our cultural present, but still one that comes to the fore at moments of acute crisis.

Is A Fall of Moondust hauntological? Yes, it is. But its modernist impulse, the conception that a better future is possible, is certainly one our time of socio-political and environmental disasters could do with gripping hold of again.

Image Credit

Local Council By-Elections: 2024 in Aggregate

848,165 votes were cast over 384 local authority contests. 104 council seats changed hands, and all percentages are rounded to the nearest decimal place. For comparison you can view last year's results here.



* Reform's comparison results are based on recomputing their tallies in Others over the last quarter/year
** There were 40 by-elections in Scotland
*** There were 23 by-elections in Wales
**** There were 37 contests with Independent clashes
***** See the quarterly round ups for the results from smaller parties

Truly a year of two halves for Labour. It was making slow inroads into the demographics that normally turn out for council by-elections and were able to pile up a decent popular vote lead up until and immediately after the general election. But that counts for nothing when the electorate sharply turns on you. Which is exactly what happened after August. The Tory gains come entirely from the latter half of the year. Labour might consider a further erosion of its roots in local government a price worth paying for chucking millions of pensioners off winter fuel allowance, but the public appear to think differently.

Good news for Kemi Badenoch then. But likewise, Reform surged in the second half of the year. The year-end modest vote total underplays their momentum. I expect that this time next year Reform will have outpaced the Liberal Democrats and Greens to claim the third party status it currently enjoys in polling. Provided they're able to find enough candidates to stand in enough seats. Overall, the Lib Dems will be happy with their by-election performances. They're doing better than what the polls are suggesting and stand to do well out of Labour's woes and those Tory leaners who don't like the direction Badenoch is leading her party in. The same goes for the Greens, though the rise of Reform has depressed their vote share. But actual votes are more or less matching the polls and the upward slope in support and councillors continues. It would be nice if they were the repository of electoral discontent rather than Reform, but these are the politics we've got.

Just a couple of other notes. It seems by-election turnout is trending downwards. This is an impression rather than something backed by data, but it's worth keeping an eye on. And there's the performance of the Independents and Others too. The rise of Reform gives legends in their own council wards opportunities to become electorally successful, so I imagine their share will decline as more would-be Indies and small party people clamber aboard the bandwagon. And with more choice available through the main parties and the major minor parties, the appeals of Indies and Others could well decline. We'll see this time next year.

Sunday, 22 December 2024

Labour's Defence of Billionaire Influence

What to do with a party that won't help itself? This is a question that will variously crop up in political comment over the next four-and-a-half years about Labour. The scenario unfolds thus. A problem presents itself to Keir Starmer. An obvious course of action could be taken that would mitigate problems for the party, might in some instances be popular, and could help increase the chances of re-election in 2028/29. And the leadership resolutely refuses to do anything about it.

Take the Elon Musk/Reform love-in for example. News, or to be more accurate, rumours started by senior Tories that Donald Trump's money man wanted to donate $100m to Nigel Farage's private company has become a self-fulfilling prophecy. Farage met Musk at Mar-a-Lago last week, and what began as gossip is now being taken seriously as a real possibility. With a hefty wodge deposited in the Reform leader's bank account, minus whatever "top up fee" he'd cream off, it would give Reform the sorts of resources that, realistically, only the Labour Party has got: a decent-sized full-time staff that can be bussed around the country, a Contact-Creator-style platform for voter ID, the budget for targeted social media advertising and literature, and the expensive "campaign specialists" capable of creating and running such an infrastructure. Reform does have a ceiling, but a professionalised operation could cause the two main parties a headache. Particularly the floundering Tories.

This has provoked calls for an overhaul of campaign financing laws. Quite sensible to stymie the influence of overseas billionaires trying to buy the future direction of British politics, you might think. 10 Downing Street, however, disagrees. An unnamed source (Morgan McSweeney) ruled out new rules governing foreign donations. "We’ll beat Reform by defeating their arguments rather than changing the rules to stop them getting money from Elon Musk ... You don’t successfully take on populists by changing the rules in bid to thwart them." Beating the extreme right by chasing them on immigration, you mean? Or conceding popular issues ripe for exploitation by a party from whom principle is merely a word in the dictionary? But taken on its own terms, the argument makes no sense. Farage's "populism" is quite conventional. It's "us", the pure, hard-done-to, innocent (white) Britons versus the corrupt establishment. As Musk and Trump are, for the moment, closely intertwined and that the president elect is largely reviled by public opinion here, the possibility of Farage pulling off a little man act with the richest man on the planet in his corner is fanciful to say the least.

Labour's cowardice speaks of an abject failure of political nerve. Except it doesn't. There are very simple reasons why Labour doesn't want changes to campaign financing, and that's because they benefit from it. We're not talking about the clean and extensively scrutinised donations from trade unions, but the bungs party coffers enjoy from the millionaire and billionaire donors Labour has courted under Starmer's leadership. They want this to continue with a minimum of public oversight because it raises awkward questions. The relationship between private health's donations to Labour and Starmer's enthusiasm to create more profitable opportunities for them in the NHS is a case in point, but there are others. More widely, if we're going to be talking negatively about foreign billionaires and British politics, that flags up the decades of vetoes one Australian billionaire has had on this country's enfeebled democracy, and the kowtowing and complicity generations of Labour politicians have had in maintaining this affair.

Billionaire money is simply a facet of how things work. Labour have made it quite clear that their project is not to change things for the better, but perfect the way of the state as is. That means no action, and another step toward embedding the extreme right as an every day feature of how we do our politics.

Image Credit

Saturday, 21 December 2024

Quarter Four By-Election Results 2024

This quarter 231,558 votes were cast in 124 local authority contests. All percentages are rounded to the nearest single decimal place. 51 council seats changed hands. For comparison you can view Quarter Three's results here. And yes, the table is rather ugly.

 

Party

Number of Candidates

Total Vote

%

+/- Q3

+/- Q4 23

Avge/
Contest


Seats

Con

        118

57,449

 24.8%

 +4.6

 +0.6

   487

  +20

Lab

        111

54,567

 23.6%

-14.5

 -1.3

   492

  -21

Lib Dem

        110

45,254

 19.5%

 +4.7

 -4.9

   411

    +2

Ref*

         63

19,686

   8.5%

 +6.0

+7.9

  312

    +7

Grn

         95

20,133

   8.7%

 -4.4

 -2.8

   212

    +2

SNP**

         22

18,020

   7.8%

 +6.3

 +6.4

   819

    -3

PC***

          6

 1,706

   0.7%

 +0.5

 +0.5

   284

      0

Ind****

         60

10,161

   4.4%

 -4.1

 -3.6

   169

    -5

Oth*****

         45

 4,582

   2.0%

 +0.7

 -2.7

   102

    -2



* Reform's comparison results are based on recomputing their tallies in Others over the last quarter/year
** There were 22 by-elections in Scotland
*** There were eight by-elections in Wales
**** There were nine Independent clashes
***** Others this quarter were Alba (239, 178, 118), British Unionist (241), Communist Party of Britain (23), Coventry Citizens Party (94), Heritage Party (61, 20, 11), Progressive Change (529), Propel (305), Scottish Family Party (83, 71, 53, 51, 25), Scottish Libertarian (15, 9), SDP (116, 33, 26, 12), Skegness Urba District Society (79), Socialist Party of Great Britain (22), Swanscombe & Greenhithe Residents' Association (395, 252), TUSC (327, 116, 76, 68, 56, 44, 35, 25, 18), UKIP (23, 11), Workers' Party (212, 143, 133, 80, 47, 40, 35, 32). The comparison figures from last year have been recomputed minus Reform's contribution.

The unprecedented becomes the precedented. No party has won such a huge parliamentary victory and seen their fortunes reverse as quickly. No party that has suffered an historic defeat has rebounded as rapidly. But these are what the numbers say. Political fortunes were going to turn against Labour at some point, and when they did the impact was always going to be disproprortionately felt at the level of council by-elections. Why? Because the age/turnout effect, i.e. the greater propensity to vote as one goes up the age range, is even more exacerbated for second order elections. And this is aggravated further by what looks like an across-the-board reduction in turnout since the general election. This matters because for the last 15 years the right have consolidated their support among older people, and when you consider how Labour expended its meagre political capital on a pointless attack on the elderly, you can see where their problems began. Caveats aside, it used to be the case that popular vote share tallies were simply effects of what was happening locally with some national overdetermination. Now, at least where the two main parties are concerned, the polls are resembling the by-elections.

Leaving aside the large SNP vote as an artefact of a greater number of Scottish by-elections than normal, the story of the quarter is the continued rise of Reform. The period underplays their potential strength because they have not stood in anywhere near as many seats as the other parties, and it's this spread of candidates that, at least for the Greens, in making them look better right now. Here the vote average is a good indicator of strength and this quarter we see that Reform is now fourth place in England and Wales, but did out-perform the Liberal Democrats in December. Unfortunately, thanks to the favourable media environment and Reform's slight age/turnout advantage over the other parties bar the Tories, if Nigel Farage can find enough candidates this rise is going to continue.

Image Credit

Friday, 20 December 2024

Local Council By-Elections December 2024

This month saw 26,636 votes cast in 18 local authority contests. All percentages are rounded to the nearest single decimal place. Seven council seats changed hands. For comparison with November's results, see here.

Party
Number of Candidates
Total Vote
%
+/- Nov
+/- Dec 23
Avge/
Contest
+/-
Seats
Conservative
          15
 5,894
    22.1%
   -0.5
     -12.3
   393
  +3
Labour
          15
 6,502
    24.4%
   -0.3
      +8.7
   433
   -4
Lib Dem
          14
 4,445
    16.7%
   -1.7
     -24.2
   318
     0
Reform*
          11
 4,192
    15.7%
  +5.6
     +15.5
   381
   +2
Green
          11
 1,883
     7.1%
  +0.6
      +0.6
   171
     0
SNP**
           2
 1,712
     6.4%
   -6.2
      +6.4
   856
     0
PC***
           1
   88
     0.3%
  +0.3
      +0.3
    88
     0
Ind****
          14
 1,489
     5.6%
  +2.2
      +4.3
   106
    -1
Other*****
           2
  421
     1.6%
   -0.2
      +1.6
   211
     0


* Reform's comparison results are based on recomputing their tallies from last year's Others
** There were two by-elections in Scotland
*** There was one by-election in Wales
**** There were four Independent clashes
***** Others this month consisted of Propel (305) and the SDP (116). The comparison figures from last year have been recomputed minus Reform's contribution.

The golden age of dozens and dozens of by-elections per month are now over, but that makes no difference to Labour's woes. Losing more than half of the seats being defended is not a good look, especially when the reactionary pairing of the Tories and Reform are helping themselves. Very few thought Labour's performance at the ballot box would nosedive so quickly after July, but that was before Winter Fuel, freebiegate, and all the rest. And it's the troops in local government who are ponying up the political price in the first instance. You don't need to wear tin foil hats to see the cancellation of some council elections this May because of the local governmentt reorganisation as a touch suss.

The Tories probably can't believe their luck as they come out on top yet again. But the results are a warning for them too. Despite getting more seats, they dropped greater vote share and the beneficiaries of that were Reform. Indeed, the votes per candidate average sis a creditable performance for the challenger party and how they are closing in on the Conservatives, which might be bad news in a general election scenario. A widespread Reform challenge five years from now makes it harder for the Tories to recover lost seats, unless some sort of deal is cut. On the wider ramifications and what kind of threat Farage presents Labour is something I'll look at in the quarterly round up.

January wil be an anomaly as there are more than a handful of by-elections scheduled. I cannot see the results being much different to those closing off 2024.

5 December
Cardiff, Splott, Lab hold
Fylde, Kilgrimol, Con gain from Ind
Glasgow, Partick East/Kelvindale, Lab gain from SNP
South Oxfordshire, Cholsey, LDem hold
Stirling, Stirling East, SNP gain from Lab
Wokingham, Shinfield, Con gain from Lab

12 December
Barnsley, Dodworth, LDem hold
Chelmsford, South Hanningfield, Stock and Margaretting, Con hold
Essex, Stock, Con hold
Runnymede, Ottershaw, Ind hold
St Helens, Blackbrook, Ref gain from Lab
Wakefield, Featherstone, Lab hold

19 December
City of London, Bassishaw, Ind hold
City of London, Billingsgate, Ind hold
City of London, Broad Street, Ind hold
Dudley, Brockmoor & Pensnett, Con gain from Lab
Greenwich, West Thamesmead, Lab hold
Swale, Milton Regis, Ref gain from Lab

Image Credit