I get a lot of emails from people who want to write an article for the school paper or talk to me on public radio. Well rather than forward the Q&A session via email to each new person, I thought I would post it here. I'm sure to catch hell with this one.
Also for the record, I never said the Dell comment in that WIRED magazine story. It was a miscommunication between those guys and me, but they were very apologetic and wanted to know if a correction needed to be run. They are good people and no harm was done so I really didn't care that much. But just so you all know - It was a choice between medical school and the Army. Not a call center and the Army.
Q&A:How is it that soldiers actually have laptops and Internet access while on
> active duty? (It's hard for those of us at home to imagine this.) And
> please help us understand how you have the time not only to write down your
> thoughts, but to maintain a very professional-looking website.First of all, combat experiences vary depending on the MOS. Some
soldiers are on vacation in Iraq. Drinking alcohol and carrying on in
speak-easies in Baghdad. I haven't seen it myself, but I've heard it firsthand from soldiers who made it to Baghdad on escort missions. Plus we (you and me both) all saw that picture in the papers of that PFC who lifted her shirt at one of these wild parties. Man what are people doing in Iraq that gives them the time to throw parties that rivaled my fraternity days in Pike at college?
Other soldiers have quiet sectors where nothing happens and there is no danger. Some people's MOS's require them to go out the gate several times a day on combat patrols to drive around in sector - presence patrols or counter-mortar missions. Other people's MOS's require them to sit at a desk from 9-5 and never see a hint of danger. All of this is relative, of course, because technically if you are in Iraq, a mortar round could fall on your head. But that's not dangerous, that's just wrong place wrong time. So take people's experiences with a grain of salt.
Just about everyone has laptops. We don't always sleep in the sand
and have no amenities. There are soldiers living in Saddam's palaces
with every luxury available to man. Satellite TV, electricity all the
time, A/C, hot showers in the winter, etc. Some of us didn't have
that. For 3 weeks in Fallujah, we just lived and fought off of our
tanks and ate muffins and powerbars and drank water. Sometimes we
were brought Gatorade or some chow from USMC Camp Fallujah. But when
we were in Baqubah, we had decent living conditions. We were living
in former Fedayeen barracks and it beat sleeping in the dirt. Living at the river bank of the Tigris sucked as far as living conditions, but we were out there by ourselves away from the company and the First Sergeant. Sometimes that is nice.
I have tried to explain this over and over again. 99% of a combat
deployment in Iraq is boring even for combat arms soldiers. We were
in Baqubah on June 24th 2004 in some the heaviest combat 3rd BDE, 1ID had ever
seen up to that point. And we were in Fallujah for the month of November
2004. Those were the two greatest combat experiences ever, yet other
than that, there wasn't too much excitement until Election Day on Jan
30th. IEDs, VBIEDs, and stupid enemies taking pot shots at us with
AK-47s are not a big deal. People make them out to be huge ambushes.
Trust me, they are not a big deal. Except in Baghdad where the IEDs
are ridiculously huge. Whole 'nother ballgame, there. Saw those craters with our own eyes as we came home from Fallujah. Those things would probably tear a tank up.
Ask any soldier, he's seen more movies on DVD than any civilian ever
will. We worked our asses off on the tanks and with maintenance and
patrols at any given time of day or night, yet we still had time to screw
around. Just imagine what a person who doesn't patrol does when he's not working 9-5. Some units even got Sundays off, which I think is ridiculous. But believe me, Iraq is not hard. On a side note - I didn't mind being out in sector all day on Thanksgiving, Christmas(it rained cold all day), or New Years. But man I woulda killed to have the day after the Super Bowl off. So I hope that answers your question about time.
Maintaining a professional looking website is nothing. Everything is
automatic with blogspot.com. I am not computer-savvy at all. Enough
said on that.
>
>
>
> What kind of civilian response have you received to your entries that
> provide detailed descriptions of battle?Mostly supportive. Some people insist that I write well and paint a
vivid picture. The compliments are very nice. But
I am no writer. I was a science-type guy in college. I never enjoyed
writing. The fact that people think I'm a good writer makes me
question the whole profession of writing. But I love my job as a tank
platoon leader and as a combat arms officer. Maybe that passion has
something to do with it.
A few negatives have appeared on the website. These negative people
know nothing of combat, so I don't really care for their opinion. If
there is one profession you cannot judge, it is the work of a combat
soldier who faces the enemy. Even soldiers cannot judge one another
unless they themselves have faced the enemy. That's why when everyone
was up in arms about that Marine sergeant who killed that guy in a
mosque, I didn't care and said out of emotion I probably would have done the same
thing. I was there in Fallujah fighting alongside the Marines. If
you weren't, then you wouldn't understand. Insurgents were walking up
with white flags or speeding in VBIEDs with white flags coming out of them. We learned that the Marines offered assistance to them
and then they blew themselves up taking dozens of Marines with them.
Every situation is different. You gotta be there to understand.
My favorite responses are from veterans - of any era. They fire me up with their energy and their passion. But especially tankers. Years go by and they still are as psyched about tanking as I am.
>
>
>
> Are there any topics that you feel are off-limits (i.e., do you censor
> yourself)?Yes, discussing classified material, current operational stuff(mission
related), and personally I don't like talking about politics or
people who died. How would I like it if my mother read about my death
on some soldier's website? In fact, I took down a post about recovering a downed vehicle and one dead and one dying soldier. I hadn't realized how widely read this website had become. It was meant for my friends and family. My post about the truck roll-over was straight facts regarding the incident and the surviving soldier had her own candid website describing her injuries and the incident. She and I emailed each other about this afterwards and she wasn't offended in the least. However, I still felt like it was inappropriate to talk about it after I put myself in the dead soldier's shoes. Now I do love talking politics with my peers. I have very strong opinions about islamic extremism. But that stuff doesn't belong on my weblog. Not while I am in the Army.
>
>
>
> Which military blogs do you find yourself reading regularly?> None, I only got involved with my blog to keep my family posted on what Fallujah was like. I don't have time to read blogs. I can't even have enough time to give my readers as much as they want. Plus most of the blogs disgust me with all of their whining and crying. Iraq isn't that bad. And before anyone interjects that I was safe in a tank - we actually spent most of our time in humvees(usually the jalopy which I loved because it never got bogged down in the mud since it wasn't armored) and doing foot patrols, so I don't want to hear it.
>
>
> Are soldier-journalists (i.e., with their ability to provide more direct and
> timely war coverage) a good thing for the military? For the administration?
> For those of us at home?For the most part, I think they are a bad thing. I have only seen a few blogs myself. All of them were negative. Most of the blogs I have heard about are negative. Some blogs contain straight lies, and are blown out
of proportion. They can give the public the wrong idea, just like the
main stream media. Not all soldiers should be talking about their work. A lot of the blogs out there are whiny. But like my platoon sergeant always says: The day a soldier stops bitching, then something is horribly wrong. Soldiers are always going to complain. Now you put that on a public forum concerning a volatile issue like the War on Terrorism and you've got trouble. Even I have gotten some facts wrong. But I will make the appropriate changes. And I am done posting anything that is a second-hand story after I got the interaction wrong between COL Pittard and General B.B. Bell. If it didn't happen to the person telling me the story, then I don't believe it happened in Iraq. That's why I was glad I got the facts straight from the source afterwards.
Our job situation is very dependent on how the public feels. For the most part, I think these blogs can do more harm than good. Freedom of speech is a right, but it also carries a responsibility. Do you know how many irresponsible people there are with voices that are heard?
Look at Dan Rather and CBS. Look at Newsweek. Lou Dobbs on CNN. These people are trusted and they misuse that trust to alter perceptions of reality. And with blogging being such a new medium, and with the public so hungry for warfront
news, people are taking blog material at face value.
>
> Should the military have control over this new form of coverage? Should the
> military control blogs that do not jeopardize operational security? Absolutely. I don't care what anybody says about free speech. I am not a civilian, I am a soldier. There is a reason we are called GIs. Yeah I have my own ideas and opinions. And in the heat of battle, my commander takes my judgment into consideration. So I know when to voice my thoughts and ideas.
But at the same time, I can't just say whatever the heck I feel like.
It can hurt the unit. We are not a 9-5 job. We are a war machine.
Very few soldiers understand that. Some soldiers don't understand
that they VOLUNTARILY gave up certain freedoms when they enlisted in the Army. Nobody made them do it. It was their own choice. Accept the reality.
So with that said, yes the military should have control over blogs.
Again, yes I have my own opinions, but again - this is a war machine comprised of men and women - people with emotions and a sense of humanity. You must foster and nurture the morale to complete the mission. How I feel politically stays behind closed doors. As it should for all active duty soldiers, especially during a time of war.
>
>
>
> In the long term, how do you expect the Pentagon to deal with military
> blogging?The Pentagon should leave it at the discretion of the commanders. My
company commander knew about my blog. It was a way for me to brag
about my soldiers to their families. Family and friends were very
proud of their soldiers in 1st Platoon. I loved hearing from a soldier that his mom, sister, or friend read about him on Armor Geddon. Especially when it came to awards. Enough cannot be said about how great these guys were downrange. I also think someone organic to the unit should monitor them randomly. I always checked with my S2 to make sure nothing I was talking about was classified. That helped
my chain of command rest assured that they weren't going to have a
security violation with me.
I realize that most of what I said above would seem to make me a
hypocrite. But I am an officer. I take my job very seriously and
take responsibility for what is said on my blog. I have a lot of
pride in the U.S. Army and our great nation. At no point during my
time as a soldier would I do or say anything to contradict the values
we try to uphold. There is a time and place for everything and it
takes a bit of common sense and maturity to run a military blog. If I were told to shut this website down, I would in an instant...And then just wait a year until I was a civilian again to put it back up.
ha.
1LT Neil Prakash