c++ - Understanding While(true) loop - Stack Overflow
Feb 2, 2015 · According to the C++ Standard, the assumption that a program will eventually do something that results in observable behavior "is intended to allow compiler transformations such as removal of empty loops, even when termination cannot be proven.
c - Simple do while loop using while (true); - Stack Overflow
May 25, 2015 · The general differentiating factor between the following loops: while (condition) {action} do {action} while (condition)
What is the proper equivalent of "while(true)" in plain C?
Jun 6, 2015 · Any of the three expressions in a for loop header can be omitted; if the second expression, which controls when the loop continues to execute, is omitted, it defaults to true. while (1) is probably the most straightforward method -- but some some compilers might warn about a condition that's always true.
c++ - while(true) versus for(;;) - Stack Overflow
Sep 27, 2010 · while (true) and for (;;) are code smells. you really need to have some proper condition to make clear what the loop is actually doing. – R. van Twisk Commented Feb 21, 2020 at 16:51
Is while (true) with break bad programming practice?
Apr 10, 2016 · To quote that noted developer of days gone by, Wordsworth:... In truth the prison, unto which we doom Ourselves, no prison is; and hence for me,
c++ - How do I use while true in threads? - Stack Overflow
Oct 30, 2015 · Based on my comment and what @Nidhoegger answered I suggest: int main() { thread t1(Loop); thread t2(SecondLoop); // Your 2 threads will run now in paralel // ... <- So some other things with your application // Now you want to close the app, perhaps all work is done or the user asked it to quit // Notify threads to stop t1running = false; t2running = false; // Wait for …
c++ - What is better for(;;) {} or while(true) {}? - Stack Overflow
Nov 1, 2012 · (I was typing this as answer): The only reason I prefer for (;;) is that the VC compilers emit the following warning when while (true) or while (1) construct is used and the warning is set to the highest level (W4): warning C4127: conditional expression is constant which is very annoying, particularly when warnings are being treated as errors (WX).
c++ - Is "for(;;)" faster than "while (true)"? If not, why do people ...
Apr 10, 2010 · In C++ while (true) is fine, but in C you depend on a header to define true, yet TRUE is a commonly used macro too. If you use while (1) it's correct in C and C++, and JavaScript, but not Java or C#, which require the loop condition to be a boolean, such as while (true) or while (1 == 1) .
c++ - for(;true;) different from while(true)? - Stack Overflow
Jan 13, 2009 · For instance, it makes it obvious that the center expression is always evaluated at the beginning of the first pass of the loop, something you may forget, but is completely unambiguous when you look at it in the while() format. Sometimes it also comes in handy to remember that. a; while(b) { ... c; } is almost (see comments) the same as
c - Use of undeclared identifier 'true' - Stack Overflow
Jan 1, 2016 · To have the compiler know true and false, one has to #include <stdbool.h>, those are not built-in - but then you can also use bool instead of _Bool (which is a bit ugly). – Daniel Fischer Commented Nov 10, 2012 at 14:33