Nov 28, 2016 · The most significant difference between the tabular and tabular* environments is that the latter can be set to occupy a pre-specified width. Often, but not necessarily, this width …

\begin{tabular}{@{}l r r@{}} that is, with one @{} to the left of first column specifier and another @{} to the right of the last column specifier. Yet the "Not So Short Guide to LaTex" says this …

From this reddit answer: You can also use normal tabular column types inside a tabularx environment. Since your table is \textwidth, you can define the first column as a fixed-width …

Vertical spacing inside tabular cells.....seemed to be a secret to me, but now I found the following: The vertical size of a tabular cell is at least \baselineskip. This is (by default) composed of: …

Apr 21, 2019 · Here's a juxtaposition of three possible solutions: with tabularx, with tabular, and with tabular*. Since there's no need for automatic line breaks in any cells, using tabularx …

Stack Exchange Network. Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their …

Feb 2, 2016 · There really is no point to using tabularx there it is designed to adjust linebreaking and you never want automatic linebreaking in data tables, just use a normal tabular – David …

Jun 5, 2021 · As @DavidCarlisle has already pointed out in a comment, nobody should ever employ \resizebox-- or its close relative, \scalebox-- to force the tabular-like material to occupy …

Feb 4, 2016 · The vertical rule on the right is not short, it's missing, because you've used \multicolumn{4}{c}{ROR} instead of

Jan 28, 2019 · The second uses a tabular* environment, with all six columns using the c column type. Both solutions occupy the full width of the textblock. Both solutions occupy the full width …