On Friday, January 17, the US Supreme Court ruled that a law that may ban TikTok in the country unless its Chinese parent company, ByteDance, sells it is constitutional. The law will take effect ...
S. (2025) Per Curiam 1 NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the United States Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court ...
Trevino was far longer than the per curiam decision of the majority. The per curiam decision is an agreed decision that isn't ...
An intensifying feud in the Arkansas Supreme Court is raising questions about how much authority the Chief Justice actually has. The very public power struggle erupted this month after newly-elected ...
Rick H. linked to the unpublished per curiam decision in Griffin v. North Carolina State Board of Elections. Three brief thoughts on it. First, last week I noted that the case potentially implicated a ...
This morning, the Court unanimously upheld the ban in an unsigned per curiam opinion. Only Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Neil Gorsuch wrote separately, but Sotomayor joined the bulk of the per ...
In a per curiam decision, the court ruled that the ban was not a violation of the First Amendment, which would require TikTok parent company ByteDance Ltd. to divest from the social media platform ...
Wullschleger, and the per curiam opinion in TikTok v. Garland, the latter already being potentially eclipsed by current events. Here's the full description: In unpredictable fashion, we record a ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results
Feedback