
Starting Out with Programming Logic and Design (4th Edition)
4th Edition
ISBN: 9780133985078
Author: Tony Gaddis
Publisher: PEARSON
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Expert Solution & Answer
Chapter 3, Problem 6SA
Explanation of Solution
Difference between pass by value and pass by reference:
| Pass by value | Pass by reference: |
|
A copy of the argument’s value which is passed into the parameter variable is referred as pass by value. |
Pass by reference allows the argument to passed into a special type of parameter called reference variable. |
|
In the pass by value, the called module creates new variables to store the value of the arguments passed to it. |
The reference variables permit the module to access the original argument of the parameter. |
|
The changes made in the formal parameters do not reflect on the actual parameters... |
Expert Solution & Answer
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!

Students have asked these similar questions
Don't use chatgpt or any other AI
Don't use chatgpt or any other AI
Given a relation schema R = (A, B, C, D, E,G) with a set of functional dependencies
F {ABCD
BC → DE
B→ D
D→ A}.
(a) Show that R is not in BCNF using the functional dependency A → BCD.
(b) Show that AG is a superkey for R
(c) Compute a canonical cover Fc for the set of functional dependencies F. Show your work.
(d) Give a 3NF decomposition of R based on the canonical cover found in (c). Show your
work.
(e) Give a BCNF decomposition of R using F. Show your work.
Chapter 3 Solutions
Starting Out with Programming Logic and Design (4th Edition)
Chapter 3.1, Problem 3.1CPChapter 3.1, Problem 3.2CPChapter 3.1, Problem 3.3CPChapter 3.1, Problem 3.4CPChapter 3.1, Problem 3.5CPChapter 3.2, Problem 3.6CPChapter 3.2, Problem 3.7CPChapter 3.2, Problem 3.8CPChapter 3.2, Problem 3.9CPChapter 3.3, Problem 3.10CP
Chapter 3.3, Problem 3.11CPChapter 3.3, Problem 3.12CPChapter 3.3, Problem 3.13CPChapter 3.4, Problem 3.14CPChapter 3.4, Problem 3.15CPChapter 3.4, Problem 3.16CPChapter 3.4, Problem 3.17CPChapter 3.4, Problem 3.18CPChapter 3.5, Problem 3.19CPChapter 3.5, Problem 3.20CPChapter 3.5, Problem 3.21CPChapter 3, Problem 1MCChapter 3, Problem 2MCChapter 3, Problem 3MCChapter 3, Problem 4MCChapter 3, Problem 5MCChapter 3, Problem 6MCChapter 3, Problem 7MCChapter 3, Problem 8MCChapter 3, Problem 9MCChapter 3, Problem 10MCChapter 3, Problem 11MCChapter 3, Problem 12MCChapter 3, Problem 13MCChapter 3, Problem 14MCChapter 3, Problem 15MCChapter 3, Problem 1TFChapter 3, Problem 2TFChapter 3, Problem 3TFChapter 3, Problem 4TFChapter 3, Problem 5TFChapter 3, Problem 6TFChapter 3, Problem 7TFChapter 3, Problem 8TFChapter 3, Problem 9TFChapter 3, Problem 10TFChapter 3, Problem 11TFChapter 3, Problem 12TFChapter 3, Problem 1SAChapter 3, Problem 2SAChapter 3, Problem 3SAChapter 3, Problem 4SAChapter 3, Problem 5SAChapter 3, Problem 6SAChapter 3, Problem 7SAChapter 3, Problem 1AWChapter 3, Problem 2AWChapter 3, Problem 3AWChapter 3, Problem 4AWChapter 3, Problem 5AWChapter 3, Problem 6AWChapter 3, Problem 7AWChapter 3, Problem 1DEChapter 3, Problem 2DEChapter 3, Problem 3DEChapter 3, Problem 4DEChapter 3, Problem 1PEChapter 3, Problem 2PEChapter 3, Problem 3PEChapter 3, Problem 4PEChapter 3, Problem 5PEChapter 3, Problem 6PEChapter 3, Problem 7PEChapter 3, Problem 8PEChapter 3, Problem 9PEChapter 3, Problem 10PEChapter 3, Problem 11PE
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, computer-science and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Similar questions
- The following entity-relationship (ER) diagram models a database that helps car deal- ers maintain records of customers and cars in their inventory. Construct a relational database schema from the ER diagram. Your set of schemas should include primary-key and foreign-key constraints and you should ensure there are no redundant schemas. has_model model modelID name vehicle has_vehicle VIN dealer_ID brand name has_available_option has_option has_dealer options options_ID specification dealer dealer ID name customer_ID owned_by customer customer ID namearrow_forwardA relation schema R = (A, B, C, D, E) with a set of functional dependencies F= {D A CAB} is decomposed into R₁ = (A, B, C) and R2 = (C, D, E). (a) Is this a lossless-join decomposition? Why or why not? (b) Is the decomposition dependency preserving? Why or why not?arrow_forwardNo chatgpt pleasearrow_forward
- Please help draw alu diagraarrow_forward1. Level the resources (R) for the following network. Show exactly which activity is being moved at each cycle and how many days it is being moved. Show all cycles required to utilize the free float and the back float. B H 3 3 L 2 0-0-0 A C F G K N P Q T 0 3 2 2 1 2-2-2 7R 8R 4R 6R 4R 2R 5R 4R D 1 2R 2 M 000 4R 2 4R 1 2 3 4 B5 B BE B 5 5 7 D 2003 C NO C MBSCM В H 5 2 F 7 7 8 SH2F80 5 Н Н 6 7 7L3G4+ 6H2G4 J 4 4 14 8 L K 00 36 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 P 2 Z+ N N 4 4 Z t 2334 4 Σ + M M 4 +arrow_forward2. Perform resource allocation for the following project. Resource limits are 6 labors and 2 helpers. Legend: Activity Dur Resources G H 2 3 2L 1H 2L OH A 1 3L 1H + B D F J K 3 4 6 2 4 4L 2H 3L OH 4L 1H 2L 2H 4L 2H C E 2 2 I 1 2L 1H 3L 1H 5L 1Harrow_forward
- Need Java method please. Thank you.arrow_forwardNeed Java method please. Thank you.arrow_forward3. Write two nested loops to generate the following output. (Note: There is one space between each number, and any extra line shown is intentional.) 12 10 8 6 18 15 12 24 20 30 2 3 3 6 48 12 5 10 15 20 6 12 18 24 30arrow_forward
- Write in verilog coding languagearrow_forwardQ4. Consider the following two design alternatives. Walmart Walmart Store locartion 1 * capacity - Associate Name 1 id position Design Alternative "A" Store locartion 1 capacity Associate Name 1 * id position Design Alternative "B" a) Explain the semantic differences between the two designs, if any. b) Explain the differences in how each design alternative may be implemented in Java. c) which design alternative may require more storage requirement in your opinion, and why?arrow_forwardDesign a schematic for a compartmental model that includes compartments, flows, and parameters with their respective units, using Figure 1 as a guide. For each flow, determine whether it is best represented by a first-order transfer, a Michaelis-Menten saturable process, or a different method.arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Programming with Microsoft Visual Basic 2017Computer ScienceISBN:9781337102124Author:Diane ZakPublisher:Cengage LearningProgramming Logic & Design ComprehensiveComputer ScienceISBN:9781337669405Author:FARRELLPublisher:Cengage
Microsoft Visual C#Computer ScienceISBN:9781337102100Author:Joyce, Farrell.Publisher:Cengage Learning,
C++ Programming: From Problem Analysis to Program...Computer ScienceISBN:9781337102087Author:D. S. MalikPublisher:Cengage Learning
C++ for Engineers and ScientistsComputer ScienceISBN:9781133187844Author:Bronson, Gary J.Publisher:Course Technology Ptr
EBK JAVA PROGRAMMINGComputer ScienceISBN:9781337671385Author:FARRELLPublisher:CENGAGE LEARNING - CONSIGNMENT

Programming with Microsoft Visual Basic 2017
Computer Science
ISBN:9781337102124
Author:Diane Zak
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Programming Logic & Design Comprehensive
Computer Science
ISBN:9781337669405
Author:FARRELL
Publisher:Cengage

Microsoft Visual C#
Computer Science
ISBN:9781337102100
Author:Joyce, Farrell.
Publisher:Cengage Learning,

C++ Programming: From Problem Analysis to Program...
Computer Science
ISBN:9781337102087
Author:D. S. Malik
Publisher:Cengage Learning

C++ for Engineers and Scientists
Computer Science
ISBN:9781133187844
Author:Bronson, Gary J.
Publisher:Course Technology Ptr

EBK JAVA PROGRAMMING
Computer Science
ISBN:9781337671385
Author:FARRELL
Publisher:CENGAGE LEARNING - CONSIGNMENT
.2: Function Parameters and Arguments - p5.js Tutorial; Author: The Coding Train;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zkc417YapfE;License: Standard Youtube License