Governor Ivey, There Is More You Can Do, and Should Rick Garlikov
Alabama Governor Kay Ivey pleaded to her unvaccinated citizens
but, Gov. Ivey, actually there is more you and others can do and that you should do. You and the legislature can
require people to get the vaccine -- in order to prevent harm to
others. There is no constitutional right or freedom to
unnecessarily endanger or harm others. And there are many laws to
prevent it.
There is
more all states and the federal government can do in the case of the COVID pandemic too. It is not just
about making people take care of "themselves", but about preventing them
from harming others. That is because
the
unvaccinated are not simply gambling with their own health and lives,
but are endangering others through the risk of becoming ill and then
incubating new mutations of the virus that will be resistant to
available vaccines. They risk becoming "patient zero" to a whole
new surge of the pandemic, and starting us all over again. If they
do that, they will be no better than the people they blame for starting
and turning loose the COVID-19 pandemic in the first place. They
will be responsible for a new round of hundreds of thousands or millions
of deaths.
There is ample precedent for laws requiring people to behave in ways
that prevent them from risking seriously endangering other people --
laws against reckless endangerment and depraved indifference
to human life. For example we have laws against drunk driving even
if one doesn't actually hit anyone. If someone could infect you
or those you love with a deadly virus, do you really want him or her to
be able to be around you or those you love any more than you want this
person to be on the road driving like this when you or they, or any other innocent people are on the road?
and, by the way, here is how this person's drive ended
Was he risking only his/her own life? Would you have
wanted you or your family to be in one of the oncoming cars? Of
course not! Well, it is the same for COVID because of the risk of
generating mutations that evade vaccine immunity! One sick person
can end up killing many people, far more than a drunk driver is likely
to kill. So if there can be laws against drunk driving or other
kinds of reckless endangerment and depraved indifference to human life,
there should easily be able to be laws against being unvaccinated
against COVID or any other deadly contagious disease, unless one is
unable to take the vaccine because of some other health condition.
And if one cannot take the vaccine, they should wear a mask and socially
isolate as much as possible, just like if one is not a drinking driver
but has a medical condition of some sort that renders his/her driving as
impaired as the driver in this video, s/he should not be allowed to
drive, even though his/her danger to others is not his/her fault.
A reporter at a White House press conference saw the problem and voiced
it to press secretary Jen Psaki, who saw part of the problem but not its
significance:
Wrong answer from the
White House. Criminalizing an activity that unnecessarily
endangers others is not "placing blame" or issuing a threat; it is a
legitimate function of government to protect innocent people from
great harm by others -- by penalizing harmful acts. The federal
government can do it in this
case, as can the state of Alabama. It is a legitimate right and
power of the state, which governments commonly exercise and would be
remiss not to. The reporter tried to point that out with a
follow-up:
but Ms.
Psaki again missed the significance of the problem and the legitimate possible solution:
No! Governments do not just
give out
information about the harms of killing people, driving drunk, or other
forms of reckless endangerment and depraved indifference or even simple negligence
and then merely hope and expect people will act reasonably and
wisely. When people ignore the word, as they do about
vaccines, governments prohibit acts that cause or risk harm to others;
they make it a crime, attach a penalty to it,
and punish people for committing it. They certainly could do it
for being willfully unvaccinated in social proximity to others.
And they should, because that is even more dangerous and potentially
deadly to far more people than driving drunk is.
Governor Ivey, and even this White House are simply not taking seriously
enough the threat to public safety and the potential cause of terrible
harm that being willfully unvaccinated presents. The should legally
prohibit it, make it a serious offense with a severe punishment
attached, and they legitimately can. The 'freedom' to
unnecessarily risk the lives of others is not a legitimate freedom nor
anyone's right. It is certainly not a right guaranteed by the
Constitution.